[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZPkyw0nAQSQWj5H1@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2023 10:17:39 +0800
From: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@...il.com>, k-hagio-ab@....com,
lijiang@...hat.com
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@...y.com>,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] mm: vmalloc: Remove global vmap_area_root rb-tree
Add Kazu and Lianbo to CC, and kexec mailing list
On 08/29/23 at 10:11am, Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) wrote:
> Store allocated objects in a separate nodes. A va->va_start
> address is converted into a correct node where it should
> be placed and resided. An addr_to_node() function is used
> to do a proper address conversion to determine a node that
> contains a VA.
>
> Such approach balances VAs across nodes as a result an access
> becomes scalable. Number of nodes in a system depends on number
> of CPUs divided by two. The density factor in this case is 1/2.
>
> Please note:
>
> 1. As of now allocated VAs are bound to a node-0. It means the
> patch does not give any difference comparing with a current
> behavior;
>
> 2. The global vmap_area_lock, vmap_area_root are removed as there
> is no need in it anymore. The vmap_area_list is still kept and
> is _empty_. It is exported for a kexec only;
I haven't taken a test, while accessing all nodes' busy tree to get
va of the lowest address could severely impact kcore reading efficiency
on system with many vmap nodes. People doing live debugging via
/proc/kcore will get a little surprise.
Empty vmap_area_list will break makedumpfile utility, Crash utility
could be impactd too. I checked makedumpfile code, it relys on
vmap_area_list to deduce the vmalloc_start value.
>
> 3. The vmallocinfo and vread() have to be reworked to be able to
> handle multiple nodes.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists