[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=McSBBeHi5jDVYOF6s1etfQzYRNLo25LeY+DWG_2tEf7=w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2023 09:57:03 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Dipen Patel <dipenp@...dia.com>
Cc: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@...il.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, timestamp@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/21] gpiolib: provide gpio_device_get_base()
On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 9:17 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 8:53 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
>
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
> >
> > Let's start adding getters for the opaque struct gpio_device. Start with
> > a function allowing to retrieve the base GPIO number.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
>
> I guess you have a solid usecase for drivers needing to do this
> crazy thing, because I suppose you feel as much as me that
> this should rather be gpiolib-internal and confined to
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h?
>
> If you add a valid reason for making this globally visible outside
> of drivers/[gpio|pinctrl] to the commit message I guess I can live
> with it because we need to think of the bigger picture:
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>
> It brings to mind the now confusing "base" inside of
> struct gpio_chip. We all know it should go away, but since it
> is never used during the lifetime of the gpio_chip - or SHOULD
> never be used - it should rather be an argument to
> [devm_]gpiochip_add_data( .... int base);...
>
> Maybe something we should add to our TODO file.
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
For this series it's the HTE driver that uses it and I don't have a
good idea about how to change it. Dipen?
I would also love to make pinctrl not use the internal GPIOLIB header
so it'll be another user, unless you can figure out a way to not use
gc->base? :)
I think we're stuck with it for now.
Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists