[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230907022929.91361-11-sj@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2023 02:29:28 +0000
From: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>, damon@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 10/11] mm/damon/core: remove duplicated comment for watermarks-based deactivation
The comment for explaining about watermarks-based monitoring part
deactivation is duplicated in two paragraphs. Remove one.
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
---
include/linux/damon.h | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/damon.h b/include/linux/damon.h
index 266f92b34dd2..ab3089de1478 100644
--- a/include/linux/damon.h
+++ b/include/linux/damon.h
@@ -317,9 +317,6 @@ struct damos_access_pattern {
* monitoring context are inactive, DAMON stops monitoring either, and just
* repeatedly checks the watermarks.
*
- * If all schemes that registered to a &struct damon_ctx are inactive, DAMON
- * stops monitoring and just repeatedly checks the watermarks.
- *
* Before applying the &action to a memory region, &struct damon_operations
* implementation could check pages of the region and skip &action to respect
* &filters
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists