[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYCOVJZ6TUMQQHSaKZHMCx8tE8=3z=1BogYTkr52mFr8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2023 09:07:53 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@...il.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Dipen Patel <dipenp@...dia.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, timestamp@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/21] gpiolib: provide gpio_device_get_desc()
On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 8:53 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
>
> Getting the GPIO descriptor directly from the gpio_chip struct is
> dangerous as we don't take the reference to the underlying GPIO device.
> In order to start working towards removing gpiochip_get_desc(), let's
> provide a safer variant that works with an existing reference to struct
> gpio_device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Andy had some good doc comments, with these addressed:
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists