[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230907-5d3da2b6dca23bedb31b33a0@orel>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2023 21:01:10 +0200
From: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
To: Haibo Xu <xiaobo55x@...il.com>
Cc: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@...el.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@...ive.com>,
wchen <waylingii@...il.com>,
Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@...tanamicro.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@...gle.com>,
Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@...gle.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@...gle.com>,
Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@...gle.com>,
Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@...gle.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>,
Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>,
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@...aro.org>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>, Like Xu <likexu@...cent.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
Michal Luczaj <mhal@...x.co>,
zhang songyi <zhang.songyi@....com.cn>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add sstc timer test
On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 12:20:29PM +0800, Haibo Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 4, 2023 at 10:58 PM Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 08:59:30PM +0800, Haibo Xu wrote:
> > > Add a KVM selftest to validate the Sstc timer functionality.
> > > The test was ported from arm64 arch timer test.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@...el.com>
> > > ---
>
> > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/arch_timer.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/arch_timer.c
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..c50a33c1e4f9
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/arch_timer.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
> > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > > +/*
> > > + * arch_timer.c - Tests the riscv64 sstc timer IRQ functionality
> > > + *
> > > + * The test validates the sstc timer IRQs using vstimecmp registers.
> > > + * It's ported from the aarch64 arch_timer test.
> > > + *
>
> > guest_run[_stage]() can be shared with aarch64, we just have a single
> > stage=0 for riscv.
> >
>
> Yes, we can. But if we share the guest_run[_stage]() by moving it to
> kvm/arch_timer.c
> or kvm/include/timer_test.h, we need to declare extra sub-functions
> somewhere in a
> header file(etc. guest_configure_timer_action()).
OK, whatever balances the reduction of duplicate code and avoidance of
exporting helper functions. BTW, riscv may not need/want all the same
helper functions as aarch64. Anyway, I guess I'll see how the next version
turns out.
>
> > > +
> > > +static void guest_code(void)
> > > +{
> > > + uint32_t cpu = guest_get_vcpuid();
> > > + struct test_vcpu_shared_data *shared_data = &vcpu_shared_data[cpu];
> > > +
> > > + local_irq_disable();
> > > + timer_irq_disable();
> > > + local_irq_enable();
> >
> > I don't think we need to disable all interrupts when disabling the timer
> > interrupt.
> >
>
> There is no local_irq_disable() protection during the initial debug
> phase, but the test always
> fail with below error messages:
>
> Guest assert failed, vcpu 0; stage; 0; iter: 0
> ==== Test Assertion Failure ====
> riscv/arch_timer.c:78: config_iter + 1 == irq_iter
> pid=585 tid=586 errno=4 - Interrupted system call
> (stack trace empty)
> 0x1 != 0x0 (config_iter + 1 != irq_iter)
>
> To be frank, I am not quite sure why the local_irq_disable/enable() matters.
> One possible reason may be some timer irq was triggered before we set up the
> timecmp register.
We should ensure we know the exact, expected state of the vcpu before,
during, and after the test. If a state doesn't match expectations,
then the test should assert and we should go investigate the test code
to see if setup/checking is correct. If it is, then we've found a bug
in KVM that we need to go investigate.
For Sstc, a pending timer interrupt completely depends on stimecmp, so
we need to watch that closely. Take a look at the attached simple timer
test I pulled together to illustrate how stimecmp, timer interrupt enable,
and all interrupt enable interact. You may want to use it to help port
the arch_timer.
Thanks,
drew
View attachment "simple-riscv-timer-test.c" of type "text/plain" (2029 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists