[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230908203655.543765-4-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2023 13:36:55 -0700
From: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
To: x86@...nel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, hjl.tools@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] x86/shstk: Add warning for shadow stack double unmap
There are several ways a thread's shadow stacks can get unmapped. This
can happen on exit or exec, as well as error handling in exec or clone.
The task struct already keeps track of the thread's shadow stack. Use the
size variable to keep track of if the shadow stack has already been freed.
When an attempt to double unmap the thread shadow stack is caught, warn
about it and abort the operation.
Tested-by: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/shstk.c | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/shstk.c b/arch/x86/kernel/shstk.c
index ad63252ebebc..59e15dd8d0f8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/shstk.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/shstk.c
@@ -426,7 +426,18 @@ void shstk_free(struct task_struct *tsk)
if (!shstk->base)
return;
+ /*
+ * shstk->base is NULL for CLONE_VFORK child tasks, and so is
+ * normal. But size = 0 on a shstk->base is not normal and
+ * indicated an attempt to free the thread shadow stack twice.
+ * Warn about it.
+ */
+ if (WARN_ON(!shstk->size))
+ return;
+
unmap_shadow_stack(shstk->base, shstk->size);
+
+ shstk->size = 0;
}
static int wrss_control(bool enable)
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists