[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <64fbacb4e51d9_1e8e7829497@iweiny-mobl.notmuch>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2023 16:22:28 -0700
From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
To: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
CC: Navneet Singh <navneet.singh@...el.com>,
Fan Ni <fan.ni@...sung.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
"Vishal Verma" <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
<linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 07/18] cxl/mem: Expose device dynamic capacity
configuration
Dave Jiang wrote:
>
>
> On 8/28/23 22:20, ira.weiny@...el.com wrote:
> > From: Navneet Singh <navneet.singh@...el.com>
> >
[snip]
> > +
> > +static umode_t cxl_dc_visible(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *a, int n)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev = kobj_to_dev(kobj);
> > + struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd = to_cxl_memdev(dev);
> > + struct cxl_memdev_state *mds = to_cxl_memdev_state(cxlmd->cxlds);
> > +
> > + /* Not a memory device */
> > + if (!mds)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + if (a == &dev_attr_region_count.attr)
> > + return a->mode;
> > +
> > + if (n < mds->nr_dc_region)
> > + return a->mode;
>
> I would add a comment on who you are checking against nr_dc_region to
> make it obvious.
Sounds good.
Thanks!
Ira
Powered by blists - more mailing lists