[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <28dce908-3a87-48c8-b181-d859697c0152@lunn.ch>
Date:   Sat, 9 Sep 2023 15:39:00 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Parthiban Veerasooran <Parthiban.Veerasooran@...rochip.com>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
        pabeni@...hat.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
        corbet@....net, steen.hegelund@...rochip.com,
        rdunlap@...radead.org, horms@...nel.org, casper.casan@...il.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com, Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com,
        Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
        Thorsten.Kummermehr@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 2/6] net: ethernet: add mac-phy interrupt
 support with reset complete handling
> +	/* Register MAC-PHY interrupt service routine */
> +	ret = devm_request_irq(&spi->dev, spi->irq, macphy_irq, 0, "macphy int",
> +			       tc6);
It looks like using threaded interrupts could save a lot of
complexity. Let the IRQ core handle all the tasklet stuff for you.
	Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
