lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230911103407.1393149-9-leitao@debian.org>
Date:   Mon, 11 Sep 2023 03:34:07 -0700
From:   Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
To:     sdf@...gle.com, axboe@...nel.dk, asml.silence@...il.com,
        willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com, kuba@...nel.org,
        martin.lau@...ux.dev, krisman@...e.de,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
        Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc:     bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
        pabeni@...hat.com, Wang Yufen <wangyufen@...wei.com>,
        Daniel Müller <deso@...teo.net>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org (open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK)
Subject: [PATCH v5 8/8] selftests/bpf/sockopt: Add io_uring support

Expand the BPF sockopt test to use also check for io_uring
{g,s}etsockopt commands operations.

Create infrastructure to run io_uring tests using the mini_liburing
helpers, so, the {g,s}etsockopt operation could either be called from
system calls, or, via io_uring.

Add a 'use_io_uring' parameter to run_test(), to specify if the test
should be run using io_uring if the parameter is set, or via the regular
system calls if false.

Call *all* tests twice, using the regular io_uring path, and the new
io_uring path.

Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt.c        | 95 +++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 89 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt.c
index 9e6a5e3ed4de..40fb4c315ad9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt.c
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 #include <test_progs.h>
+#include <io_uring/mini_liburing.h>
 #include "cgroup_helpers.h"
 
 static char bpf_log_buf[4096];
@@ -940,7 +941,85 @@ static int load_prog(const struct bpf_insn *insns,
 	return fd;
 }
 
-static int run_test(int cgroup_fd, struct sockopt_test *test)
+/* Core function that handles io_uring ring initialization,
+ * sending SQE with sockopt command and waiting for the CQE.
+ */
+static int uring_sockopt(int op, int fd, int level, int optname,
+			 const void *optval, socklen_t *optlen)
+{
+	struct io_uring_cqe *cqe;
+	struct io_uring_sqe *sqe;
+	struct io_uring ring;
+	int err;
+
+	err = io_uring_queue_init(1, &ring, 0);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "Initialize io_uring ring"))
+		return err;
+
+	sqe = io_uring_get_sqe(&ring);
+	if (!ASSERT_NEQ(sqe, NULL, "Get an SQE")) {
+		err = -1;
+		goto fail;
+	}
+
+	if (op == SOCKET_URING_OP_GETSOCKOPT)
+		io_uring_prep_cmd_get(sqe, op, fd, level, optname, optval,
+				      optlen);
+	else
+		io_uring_prep_cmd(sqe, op, fd, level, optname, optval,
+				  *optlen);
+
+	err = io_uring_submit(&ring);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, 1, "Submit SQE"))
+		goto fail;
+
+	err = io_uring_wait_cqe(&ring, &cqe);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "Wait for CQE"))
+		goto fail;
+
+	err = cqe->res;
+
+fail:
+	io_uring_queue_exit(&ring);
+
+	return err;
+}
+
+static int uring_setsockopt(int fd, int level, int optname, const void *optval,
+			    socklen_t *optlen)
+{
+	return uring_sockopt(SOCKET_URING_OP_SETSOCKOPT, fd, level, optname,
+			     optval, optlen);
+}
+
+static int uring_getsockopt(int fd, int level, int optname, void *optval,
+			    socklen_t *optlen)
+{
+	return uring_sockopt(SOCKET_URING_OP_GETSOCKOPT, fd, level, optname,
+			     optval, optlen);
+}
+
+/* Execute the setsocktopt operation */
+static int call_setsockopt(bool use_io_uring, int fd, int level, int optname,
+			   const void *optval, socklen_t optlen)
+{
+	if (use_io_uring)
+		return uring_setsockopt(fd, level, optname, optval, &optlen);
+
+	return setsockopt(fd, level, optname, optval, optlen);
+}
+
+/* Execute the getsocktopt operation */
+static int call_getsockopt(bool use_io_uring, int fd, int level, int optname,
+			   void *optval, socklen_t *optlen)
+{
+	if (use_io_uring)
+		return uring_getsockopt(fd, level, optname, optval, optlen);
+
+	return getsockopt(fd, level, optname, optval, optlen);
+}
+
+static int run_test(int cgroup_fd, struct sockopt_test *test, bool use_io_uring)
 {
 	int sock_fd, err, prog_fd;
 	void *optval = NULL;
@@ -980,8 +1059,9 @@ static int run_test(int cgroup_fd, struct sockopt_test *test)
 			test->set_optlen = num_pages * sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE) + remainder;
 		}
 
-		err = setsockopt(sock_fd, test->set_level, test->set_optname,
-				 test->set_optval, test->set_optlen);
+		err = call_setsockopt(use_io_uring, sock_fd, test->set_level,
+				      test->set_optname, test->set_optval,
+				      test->set_optlen);
 		if (err) {
 			if (errno == EPERM && test->error == EPERM_SETSOCKOPT)
 				goto close_sock_fd;
@@ -1008,8 +1088,8 @@ static int run_test(int cgroup_fd, struct sockopt_test *test)
 		socklen_t expected_get_optlen = test->get_optlen_ret ?:
 			test->get_optlen;
 
-		err = getsockopt(sock_fd, test->get_level, test->get_optname,
-				 optval, &optlen);
+		err = call_getsockopt(use_io_uring, sock_fd, test->get_level,
+				      test->get_optname, optval, &optlen);
 		if (err) {
 			if (errno == EOPNOTSUPP && test->error == EOPNOTSUPP_GETSOCKOPT)
 				goto free_optval;
@@ -1063,7 +1143,10 @@ void test_sockopt(void)
 		if (!test__start_subtest(tests[i].descr))
 			continue;
 
-		ASSERT_OK(run_test(cgroup_fd, &tests[i]), tests[i].descr);
+		ASSERT_OK(run_test(cgroup_fd, &tests[i], false),
+			  tests[i].descr);
+		ASSERT_OK(run_test(cgroup_fd, &tests[i], true),
+			  tests[i].descr);
 	}
 
 	close(cgroup_fd);
-- 
2.34.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ