[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230911153733.GA3880@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 17:37:33 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@...ux.dev>
Cc: corbet@....net, mingo@...hat.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com, mhiramat@...nel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Change the name of preempt mode from full to
low_latency
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 07:00:46PM +0800, Yajun Deng wrote:
> There is a similar name fully in Kconfig.preempt, but it corresponds to
> PREEMPT_RT. In order to distinguish them, change the name of preempt mode
> from full to low_latency.
>
> Also, define a global array and variable that used to save preempt mode
> name and size.
Yeah, let's not rename this for giggles. Regular preemption is a fully
preemptible kernel model. No need to invent new names for it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists