[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1e8fcce9-fda4-7bf7-97c3-cb9e4a4d788e@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:55:56 +0530
From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@....com>
To: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev, lkp@...el.com,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ying.huang@...el.com,
feng.tang@...el.com, fengwei.yin@...el.com,
aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com, yu.c.chen@...el.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, rppt@...nel.org,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Aithal Srikanth <sraithal@....com>,
Sapkal Swapnil <Swapnil.Sapkal@....com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V1 5/6] sched/numa: Allow recently accessed VMAs to be
scanned
On 9/10/2023 8:59 PM, kernel test robot wrote:
> 341.49 -4.1% 327.42 ± 2% autonuma-benchmark.numa01.seconds
> 186.67 ± 6% -27.1% 136.12 ± 7% autonuma-benchmark.numa01_THREAD_ALLOC.seconds
> 21.17 ± 7% -33.6% 14.05 autonuma-benchmark.numa02.seconds
> 2200 ± 2% -13.0% 1913 ± 3% autonuma-benchmark.time.elapsed_time
Hello Oliver/Kernel test robot,
Thank yo alot for testing.
Results are impressive. Can I take this result as
positive for whole series too?
Mel/PeterZ,
Whenever time permits can you please let us know your comments/concerns
on the series?
Thanks and Regards
- Raghu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists