linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V13 2/5] PCI: Create device tree node for bridge

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230911164741.00003904@Huawei.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:47:41 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
To:     Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>
CC:     Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@....com>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <robh@...nel.org>, <max.zhen@....com>, <sonal.santan@....com>,
        <stefano.stabellini@...inx.com>,
        Clément Léger <clement.leger@...tlin.com>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V13 2/5] PCI: Create device tree node for bridge

On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 17:35:03 +0200
Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com> wrote:

> Hi Jonathan,
> 
> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 15:48:56 +0100
> Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 10:19:57 -0700
> > Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@....com> wrote:
> >   
> > > The PCI endpoint device such as Xilinx Alveo PCI card maps the register
> > > spaces from multiple hardware peripherals to its PCI BAR. Normally,
> > > the PCI core discovers devices and BARs using the PCI enumeration process.
> > > There is no infrastructure to discover the hardware peripherals that are
> > > present in a PCI device, and which can be accessed through the PCI BARs.
> > > 
> > > Apparently, the device tree framework requires a device tree node for the
> > > PCI device. Thus, it can generate the device tree nodes for hardware
> > > peripherals underneath. Because PCI is self discoverable bus, there might
> > > not be a device tree node created for PCI devices. Furthermore, if the PCI
> > > device is hot pluggable, when it is plugged in, the device tree nodes for
> > > its parent bridges are required. Add support to generate device tree node
> > > for PCI bridges.
> > > 
> > > Add an of_pci_make_dev_node() interface that can be used to create device
> > > tree node for PCI devices.
> > > 
> > > Add a PCI_DYNAMIC_OF_NODES config option. When the option is turned on,
> > > the kernel will generate device tree nodes for PCI bridges unconditionally.
> > > 
> > > Initially, add the basic properties for the dynamically generated device
> > > tree nodes which include #address-cells, #size-cells, device_type,
> > > compatible, ranges, reg.
> > > 
> > > Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@....com>    
> > 
> > I tried to bring this up for a custom PCIe card emulated in QEMU on an ARM ACPI
> > machine.
> > 
> > There are some missing parts that were present in Clements series, but not this
> > one, particularly creation of the root pci object.
> > 
> > Anyhow, hit an intermittent crash...  
> 
> I am facing the same issues.
> 
> I use a custom PCIe board too but on x86 ACPI machine.
> 
> In order to have a working system, I need also to build a DT node for the PCI
> Host bridge (previously done by Clement's patch) and I am a bit stuck with
> interrupts.
> 
> On your side (ACPI machine) how do you handle this ?

That was next on my list to look at now I've gotten the device tree stuff
to show up.

> I mean is your PCI host bridge provided by ACPI ? And if so, you probably need
> to build a DT node for this PCI host bridge and add some interrupt-map,
> interrupt-map-mask properties in the DT node.

Agreed. Potentially some other stuff, but interrupts are the thing that
showed up first as an issue.

Given the only reason I'm looking at this is to potentially solve
a long term CXL / MCTP over I2C upstreaming problem on QEMU side, I've only
limited time to throw at this (thought it was a short activity
for a Friday afternoon :)  Will see if it turns out not too be
too hard to build the rest.

I can at least boot same system with device tree and check I'm matching
what is being generated by QEMU.

Jonathan


> 
> Best regards,
> Hervé
>