[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7dc56344-ee1c-43d4-9751-ded8f76d5852@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 08:55:10 +0300
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
alim.akhtar@...sung.com, avri.altman@....com, bvanassche@....org,
jejb@...ux.ibm.com, beanhuo@...ron.com, sc.suh@...sung.com,
hy50.seo@...sung.com, sh425.lee@...sung.com,
kwangwon.min@...sung.com, junwoo80.lee@...sung.com,
wkon.kim@...sung.com,
"'Martin K. Petersen'" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 0/2] change UIC command handling
On 11/09/23 04:35, Kiwoong Kim wrote:
>>> v2 -> v3: rule out the change of polling w/ pmc from this thread.
>>> (I'll post the change later)
>>> v1 -> v2: remove an unused variable in __ufshcd_send_uic_cmd
>>>
>>> Kiwoong Kim (2):
>>> ufs: make __ufshcd_send_uic_cmd not wrapped by host_lock
>>> ufs: poll HCS.UCRDY before issuing a UIC command
>>
>> Applied to 6.6/scsi-staging, thanks!
>>
>> --
>> Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
>
> Hi, Martin
>
> The following patch seems to make trouble because of using
> read_poll_timeout.
> Its initial version used udelay and after discussion it's been changed.
> Could you revert this patch set?
>
>> ufs: poll HCS.UCRDY before issuing a UIC command
>
> [ 4671.226480] [3: kworker/u20:29:17140] BUG: scheduling while atomic:
> kworker/u20:29/17140/0x00000002
> ..
> [ 4671.228723] [3: kworker/u20:29:17140] panic+0x16c/0x388
> [ 4671.228745] [3: kworker/u20:29:17140] check_panic_on_warn+0x60/0x94
> [ 4671.228764] [3: kworker/u20:29:17140] __schedule_bug+0x6c/0x94
> [ 4671.228786] [3: kworker/u20:29:17140] __schedule+0x6f4/0xa64
> [ 4671.228806] [3: kworker/u20:29:17140] schedule+0x7c/0xe8
> [ 4671.228824] [3: kworker/u20:29:17140]
> schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock+0x98/0x114
> [ 4671.228841] [3: kworker/u20:29:17140] schedule_hrtimeout_range+0x14/0x24
> [ 4671.228856] [3: kworker/u20:29:17140] usleep_range_state+0x60/0x94
> [ 4671.228871] [3: kworker/u20:29:17140] __ufshcd_send_uic_cmd+0xa0/0x1c4
> [ 4671.228893] [3: kworker/u20:29:17140] ufshcd_uic_pwr_ctrl+0x15c/0x390
> [ 4671.228908] [3: kworker/u20:29:17140]
> ufshcd_uic_hibern8_enter+0x9c/0x25c
> [ 4671.228922] [3: kworker/u20:29:17140]
> ufshcd_link_state_transition+0x34/0xb0
> [ 4671.228939] [3: kworker/u20:29:17140] __ufshcd_wl_suspend+0x3f0/0x4b4
Do you know what is in that path that makes it an atomic context?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists