[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <68cb338c-f293-b69a-06f1-fc54b3be1933@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 09:14:42 +0800
From: Xiubo Li <xiubli@...hat.com>
To: Luís Henriques <lhenriques@...e.de>,
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Milind Changire <mchangir@...hat.com>
Cc: ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ceph: remove unnecessary check for NULL in
parse_longname()
On 9/8/23 19:20, Luís Henriques wrote:
> Function ceph_get_inode() never returns NULL; instead it returns an
> ERR_PTR() if something fails. Thus, the check for NULL in parse_longname()
> is useless and can be dropped. Instead, move there the debug code that
> does the error checking so that it's only executed if ceph_get_inode() is
> called.
>
> Fixes: dd66df0053ef ("ceph: add support for encrypted snapshot names")
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Luís Henriques <lhenriques@...e.de>
> ---
> Changes since v2:
> As suggested by Xiubo, moved the error checking into the 'if (!dir)'
> block.
>
> fs/ceph/crypto.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/crypto.c b/fs/ceph/crypto.c
> index e4d5cd56a80b..e1f31b86fd48 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/crypto.c
> +++ b/fs/ceph/crypto.c
> @@ -249,11 +249,9 @@ static struct inode *parse_longname(const struct inode *parent,
> if (!dir) {
> /* This can happen if we're not mounting cephfs on the root */
> dir = ceph_get_inode(parent->i_sb, vino, NULL);
> - if (!dir)
> - dir = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
> + if (IS_ERR(dir))
> + dout("Can't find inode %s (%s)\n", inode_number, name);
> }
> - if (IS_ERR(dir))
> - dout("Can't find inode %s (%s)\n", inode_number, name);
>
> out:
> kfree(inode_number);
>
LGTM.
Applied to the testing branch and will run the tests.
Thanks Luis.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists