[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <649e89c3-343a-c00c-ae89-329833b38981@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 09:06:55 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Macpaul Lin <macpaul.lin@...iatek.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@...libre.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Bear Wang <bear.wang@...iatek.com>,
Pablo Sun <pablo.sun@...iatek.com>,
Macpaul Lin <macpaul@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm64: dts: mediatek: add description for
mt8365-evk board
On 11/09/2023 08:34, Macpaul Lin wrote:
> On 9/11/23 14:09, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>
>>
>> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until you
>> have verified the sender or the content.
>>
>> On 10/09/2023 14:07, Macpaul Lin wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/10/23 17:09, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> + - description: MediaTek Genio 350 Boards (Genio 350 EVK)
>>>>
>>>> That's a bit confusing. So all of the boards here will be Genio 350 EVK?
>>>> I don't get what is the point of this description.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> + items:
>>>>> - enum:
>>>>> - mediatek,mt8365-evk
>>>>> - const: mediatek,mt8365
>>>
>>> Thes boards with compatible 'mediatek,mt8365-evk' is indeed used by
>>
>> Boards?
>
> I'm not sure if there will be more hardware version released to market.
> Current the p1v3 is the final version of mt8365-evk.
Then your code (enum) does not match description. The code is saying:
this is for multiple boards based on mt8365.
Your description is saying: this is only for 350 boards.
Now your email is saying: there is only one 350 board.
Three different versions. Sorry, I am confused.
>
>>> Genio 350-EVK, which Baylibre helped to do upstream tasks. The only
>>> production version of hardware will be available on the market. The
>>> derived version of customer's hardware is not available yet.
>>>
>>> The separate patch for renaming mt8365-evk.dts file should be send next
>>> week for aligning the naming rules.
>>
>> So the description is not correct.
>>
>> Anyway, this patch does not make much sense to me considering nothing
>> like this was merged. You just sent v5 doing the same!
>
>
> Sorry I'm confused now.
> These are independent patches.
> This patch is for SOC mt83'6'5 and board mt8365-evk, which is not relate
> SOC mt83'9'5 and board mt8395-evk.
OK, I see my confusion. mt8365 and mt8395.
Still the description is not matching the code, at least to my limited
understanding of the description.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists