linux-kernel - RE: [RESEND PATCH v3 0/2] change UIC command handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <000601d9e480$dc0ebb00$942c3100$@samsung.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:23:28 +0900
From:   "Kiwoong Kim" <kwmad.kim@...sung.com>
To:     "'Adrian Hunter'" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc:     <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, <avri.altman@....com>,
        <bvanassche@....org>, <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>, <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
        <sc.suh@...sung.com>, <hy50.seo@...sung.com>,
        <sh425.lee@...sung.com>, <kwangwon.min@...sung.com>,
        <junwoo80.lee@...sung.com>, <wkon.kim@...sung.com>,
        "'Martin K. Petersen'" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: RE: [RESEND PATCH v3 0/2] change UIC command handling

> > static int ufshcd_uic_pwr_ctrl(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct uic_command
> > *cmd) ..
> >         bool reenable_intr = false;
> >
> >         mutex_lock(&hba->uic_cmd_mutex); <<<<
> 
> It is OK to schedule while holding a mutex.  Are you sure this is the
> problem?

Ah, I mis-understood it. It was for not applying this.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/782ba5f26f0a96e58d85dff50751787d2d2a6b2b.1693790060.git.kwmad.kim@samsung.com/

So this patch set has no problem. Sorry for bothering all of you.

Thanks.