lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e1f07420c9d7abf26cf9ce111c063224001ba561.camel@mediatek.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Sep 2023 13:45:34 +0000
From:   Shawn Sung (宋孝謙) 
        <Shawn.Sung@...iatek.com>
To:     "p.zabel@...gutronix.de" <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        "airlied@...il.com" <airlied@...il.com>,
        "matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        "daniel@...ll.ch" <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        "angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com" 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
        "chunkuang.hu@...nel.org" <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
        "jassisinghbrar@...il.com" <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>
CC:     "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) 
        <Jason-JH.Lin@...iatek.com>,
        Nancy Lin (林欣螢) <Nancy.Lin@...iatek.com>,
        Singo Chang (張興國) 
        <Singo.Chang@...iatek.com>,
        Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group 
        <Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/15] drm/mediatek: Add missing plane settings when async
 update

Hi Angelo,

On Thu, 2023-09-07 at 14:33 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 23/08/23 17:13, Hsiao Chien Sung ha scritto:
> > Fix an issue that plane coordinate was not saved when
> > calling async update.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Hsiao Chien Sung <shawn.sung@...iatek.com>
> 
>  From what I understand, this is a fix for an issue that was present
> before
> your newly introduced code.
> 
> This means that you want to add a Fixes tag, and that you should also
> send
> this commit separately from the IGT series. Please do that.

Got it, will add a fix tag in the next version. But since without this
patch, IGT will fail at some test cases, could we still send them in
the same series so IGT can pass out-of-the-box?

Thanks,

Hsiao Chien Sung

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ