[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230911203628.20068-1-hugo@hugovil.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:36:30 -0400
From: Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@...ovil.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: hugo@...ovil.com, Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, workflows@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] Documentation: stable: clarify patch series prerequisites
From: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>
Add some clarifications for patches that have dependencies within the
patch series.
Signed-off-by: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>
---
Changes since v1: rebase on latest torvalds/master
Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst | 13 +++++++++++++
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst b/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst
index 41f1e07abfdf..1704f1c686d0 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst
@@ -101,6 +101,19 @@ comment:
git cherry-pick fd21073
git cherry-pick <this commit>
+ Note that for a patch series, you do not have to list as prerequisites the
+ patches present in the series itself. For example, if you have the following
+ patch series:
+
+ .. code-block:: none
+
+ patch1
+ patch2
+
+ where patch2 depends on patch1, you do not have to list patch1 as
+ prerequisite of patch2 if you have already marked patch1 for stable
+ inclusion.
+
* For patches that may have kernel version prerequisites specify them using
the following format in the sign-off area:
base-commit: 0bb80ecc33a8fb5a682236443c1e740d5c917d1d
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists