[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <839321b9-fe5b-9548-84d7-1d0867a65ffd@loongson.cn>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 18:13:13 +0800
From: zhaotianrui <zhaotianrui@...ngson.cn>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>, maobibo@...ngson.cn,
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 09/30] LoongArch: KVM: Implement vcpu get, vcpu set
registers
在 2023/9/11 下午6:03, zhaotianrui 写道:
>
> 在 2023/9/11 下午5:03, Huacai Chen 写道:
>> Hi, Tianrui,
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 4:30 PM Tianrui Zhao
>> <zhaotianrui@...ngson.cn> wrote:
>>> Implement LoongArch vcpu get registers and set registers operations, it
>>> is called when user space use the ioctl interface to get or set regs.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Bibo Mao <maobibo@...ngson.cn>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tianrui Zhao <zhaotianrui@...ngson.cn>
>>> ---
>>> arch/loongarch/kvm/csr_ops.S | 67 ++++++++++++
>>> arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c | 206
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 2 files changed, 273 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 arch/loongarch/kvm/csr_ops.S
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kvm/csr_ops.S
>>> b/arch/loongarch/kvm/csr_ops.S
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000000..53e44b23a5
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kvm/csr_ops.S
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>>> +/*
>>> + * Copyright (C) 2020-2023 Loongson Technology Corporation Limited
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +#include <asm/regdef.h>
>>> +#include <linux/linkage.h>
>>> + .text
>>> + .cfi_sections .debug_frame
>>> +/*
>>> + * we have splited hw gcsr into three parts, so we can
>>> + * calculate the code offset by gcsrid and jump here to
>>> + * run the gcsrwr instruction.
>>> + */
>>> +SYM_FUNC_START(set_hw_gcsr)
>>> + addi.d t0, a0, 0
>>> + addi.w t1, zero, 96
>>> + bltu t1, t0, 1f
>>> + la.pcrel t0, 10f
>>> + alsl.d t0, a0, t0, 3
>>> + jr t0
>>> +1:
>>> + addi.w t1, a0, -128
>>> + addi.w t2, zero, 15
>>> + bltu t2, t1, 2f
>>> + la.pcrel t0, 11f
>>> + alsl.d t0, t1, t0, 3
>>> + jr t0
>>> +2:
>>> + addi.w t1, a0, -384
>>> + addi.w t2, zero, 3
>>> + bltu t2, t1, 3f
>>> + la.pcrel t0, 12f
>>> + alsl.d t0, t1, t0, 3
>>> + jr t0
>>> +3:
>>> + addi.w a0, zero, -1
>>> + jr ra
>>> +
>>> +/* range from 0x0(KVM_CSR_CRMD) to 0x60(KVM_CSR_LLBCTL) */
>>> +10:
>>> + csrnum = 0
>>> + .rept 0x61
>>> + gcsrwr a1, csrnum
>>> + jr ra
>>> + csrnum = csrnum + 1
>>> + .endr
>>> +
>>> +/* range from 0x80(KVM_CSR_IMPCTL1) to 0x8f(KVM_CSR_TLBRPRMD) */
>>> +11:
>>> + csrnum = 0x80
>>> + .rept 0x10
>>> + gcsrwr a1, csrnum
>>> + jr ra
>>> + csrnum = csrnum + 1
>>> + .endr
>>> +
>>> +/* range from 0x180(KVM_CSR_DMWIN0) to 0x183(KVM_CSR_DMWIN3) */
>>> +12:
>>> + csrnum = 0x180
>>> + .rept 0x4
>>> + gcsrwr a1, csrnum
>>> + jr ra
>>> + csrnum = csrnum + 1
>>> + .endr
>>> +
>>> +SYM_FUNC_END(set_hw_gcsr)
>>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c b/arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c
>>> index ca4e8d074e..f17422a942 100644
>>> --- a/arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c
>>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c
>>> @@ -13,6 +13,212 @@
>>> #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
>>> #include "trace.h"
>>>
>>> +int _kvm_getcsr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int id, u64 *v)
>>> +{
>>> + unsigned long val;
>>> + struct loongarch_csrs *csr = vcpu->arch.csr;
>>> +
>>> + if (get_gcsr_flag(id) & INVALID_GCSR)
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> + if (id == LOONGARCH_CSR_ESTAT) {
>>> + /* interrupt status IP0 -- IP7 from GINTC */
>>> + val = kvm_read_sw_gcsr(csr, LOONGARCH_CSR_GINTC) &
>>> 0xff;
>>> + *v = kvm_read_sw_gcsr(csr, id) | (val << 2);
>>> + return 0;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * get software csr state if csrid is valid, since software
>>> + * csr state is consistent with hardware
>>> + */
>> After a long time thinking, I found this is wrong. Of course
>> _kvm_setcsr() saves a software copy of the hardware registers, but the
>> hardware status will change. For example, during a VM running, it may
>> change the EUEN register if it uses fpu.
>>
>> So, we should do things like what we do in our internal repo,
>> _kvm_getcsr() should get values from hardware for HW_GCSR registers.
>> And we also need a get_hw_gcsr assembly function.
>>
>>
>> Huacai
> This is a asynchronous vcpu ioctl action, that is to say this action
> take place int the vcpu thread after vcpu get out of guest mode, and
> the guest registers have been saved in software, so we could return
> software register value when get guest csr.
>
> Thanks
> Tianrui Zhao
This sentence should be This is a **synchronous** vcpu ioctl action, ... ...
Sorry this is my spelling mistake.
Thanks
Tianrui Zhao
>>
>>> + *v = kvm_read_sw_gcsr(csr, id);
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +int _kvm_setcsr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int id, u64 val)
>>> +{
>>> + struct loongarch_csrs *csr = vcpu->arch.csr;
>>> + int ret = 0, gintc;
>>> +
>>> + if (get_gcsr_flag(id) & INVALID_GCSR)
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> + if (id == LOONGARCH_CSR_ESTAT) {
>>> + /* estat IP0~IP7 inject through guestexcept */
>>> + gintc = (val >> 2) & 0xff;
>>> + write_csr_gintc(gintc);
>>> + kvm_set_sw_gcsr(csr, LOONGARCH_CSR_GINTC, gintc);
>>> +
>>> + gintc = val & ~(0xffUL << 2);
>>> + write_gcsr_estat(gintc);
>>> + kvm_set_sw_gcsr(csr, LOONGARCH_CSR_ESTAT, gintc);
>>> +
>>> + return ret;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (get_gcsr_flag(id) & HW_GCSR) {
>>> + set_hw_gcsr(id, val);
>>> + /* write sw gcsr to keep consistent with hardware */
>>> + kvm_write_sw_gcsr(csr, id, val);
>>> + } else
>>> + kvm_write_sw_gcsr(csr, id, val);
>>> +
>>> + return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int _kvm_get_one_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>> + const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, s64 *v)
>>> +{
>>> + int reg_idx, ret = 0;
>>> +
>>> + if ((reg->id & KVM_REG_LOONGARCH_MASK) ==
>>> KVM_REG_LOONGARCH_CSR) {
>>> + reg_idx = KVM_GET_IOC_CSRIDX(reg->id);
>>> + ret = _kvm_getcsr(vcpu, reg_idx, v);
>>> + } else if (reg->id == KVM_REG_LOONGARCH_COUNTER)
>>> + *v = drdtime() + vcpu->kvm->arch.time_offset;
>>> + else
>>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> + return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int _kvm_get_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct
>>> kvm_one_reg *reg)
>>> +{
>>> + int ret = -EINVAL;
>>> + s64 v;
>>> +
>>> + if ((reg->id & KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK) != KVM_REG_SIZE_U64)
>>> + return ret;
>>> +
>>> + if (_kvm_get_one_reg(vcpu, reg, &v))
>>> + return ret;
>>> +
>>> + return put_user(v, (u64 __user *)(long)reg->addr);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int _kvm_set_one_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>> + const struct kvm_one_reg *reg,
>>> + s64 v)
>>> +{
>>> + int ret = 0;
>>> + unsigned long flags;
>>> + u64 val;
>>> + int reg_idx;
>>> +
>>> + val = v;
>>> + if ((reg->id & KVM_REG_LOONGARCH_MASK) ==
>>> KVM_REG_LOONGARCH_CSR) {
>>> + reg_idx = KVM_GET_IOC_CSRIDX(reg->id);
>>> + ret = _kvm_setcsr(vcpu, reg_idx, val);
>>> + } else if (reg->id == KVM_REG_LOONGARCH_COUNTER) {
>>> + local_irq_save(flags);
>>> + /*
>>> + * gftoffset is relative with board, not vcpu
>>> + * only set for the first time for smp system
>>> + */
>>> + if (vcpu->vcpu_id == 0)
>>> + vcpu->kvm->arch.time_offset = (signed
>>> long)(v - drdtime());
>>> + write_csr_gcntc((ulong)vcpu->kvm->arch.time_offset);
>>> + local_irq_restore(flags);
>>> + } else if (reg->id == KVM_REG_LOONGARCH_VCPU_RESET) {
>>> + kvm_reset_timer(vcpu);
>>> + memset(&vcpu->arch.irq_pending, 0,
>>> sizeof(vcpu->arch.irq_pending));
>>> + memset(&vcpu->arch.irq_clear, 0,
>>> sizeof(vcpu->arch.irq_clear));
>>> + } else
>>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> + return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int _kvm_set_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct
>>> kvm_one_reg *reg)
>>> +{
>>> + s64 v;
>>> + int ret = -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> + if ((reg->id & KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK) != KVM_REG_SIZE_U64)
>>> + return ret;
>>> +
>>> + if (get_user(v, (u64 __user *)(long)reg->addr))
>>> + return ret;
>>> +
>>> + return _kvm_set_one_reg(vcpu, reg, v);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_get_sregs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>> + struct kvm_sregs *sregs)
>>> +{
>>> + return -ENOIOCTLCMD;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_sregs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>> + struct kvm_sregs *sregs)
>>> +{
>>> + return -ENOIOCTLCMD;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_get_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct
>>> kvm_regs *regs)
>>> +{
>>> + int i;
>>> +
>>> + vcpu_load(vcpu);
>>> +
>>> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(vcpu->arch.gprs); i++)
>>> + regs->gpr[i] = vcpu->arch.gprs[i];
>>> +
>>> + regs->pc = vcpu->arch.pc;
>>> +
>>> + vcpu_put(vcpu);
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct
>>> kvm_regs *regs)
>>> +{
>>> + int i;
>>> +
>>> + vcpu_load(vcpu);
>>> +
>>> + for (i = 1; i < ARRAY_SIZE(vcpu->arch.gprs); i++)
>>> + vcpu->arch.gprs[i] = regs->gpr[i];
>>> + vcpu->arch.gprs[0] = 0; /* zero is special, and cannot be
>>> set. */
>>> + vcpu->arch.pc = regs->pc;
>>> +
>>> + vcpu_put(vcpu);
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +long kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl(struct file *filp,
>>> + unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long arg)
>>> +{
>>> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = filp->private_data;
>>> + void __user *argp = (void __user *)arg;
>>> + long r;
>>> +
>>> + vcpu_load(vcpu);
>>> +
>>> + switch (ioctl) {
>>> + case KVM_SET_ONE_REG:
>>> + case KVM_GET_ONE_REG: {
>>> + struct kvm_one_reg reg;
>>> +
>>> + r = -EFAULT;
>>> + if (copy_from_user(®, argp, sizeof(reg)))
>>> + break;
>>> + if (ioctl == KVM_SET_ONE_REG)
>>> + r = _kvm_set_reg(vcpu, ®);
>>> + else
>>> + r = _kvm_get_reg(vcpu, ®);
>>> + break;
>>> + }
>>> + default:
>>> + r = -ENOIOCTLCMD;
>>> + break;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + vcpu_put(vcpu);
>>> + return r;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> int kvm_arch_vcpu_precreate(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int id)
>>> {
>>> return 0;
>>> --
>>> 2.27.0
>>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists