[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tencent_157A2A1CAF19A3F5885F0687426159A19708@qq.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 22:55:09 +0800
From: Rong Tao <rtoax@...mail.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, keescook@...omium.org,
brauner@...nel.org, rongtao@...tc.cn, rtoax@...mail.com
Cc: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...gle.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH] pid: pid_ns_ctl_handler: Remove useless comment
From: Rong Tao <rongtao@...tc.cn>
commit 95846ecf9dac("pid: replace pid bitmap implementation with IDR API")
removes 'last_pid' element, and use the idr_get_cursor-idr_set_cursor pair
to set the value of idr, so useless comments should be removed.
Signed-off-by: Rong Tao <rongtao@...tc.cn>
---
kernel/pid_namespace.c | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/pid_namespace.c b/kernel/pid_namespace.c
index 619972c78774..3028b2218aa4 100644
--- a/kernel/pid_namespace.c
+++ b/kernel/pid_namespace.c
@@ -286,12 +286,6 @@ static int pid_ns_ctl_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
if (write && !checkpoint_restore_ns_capable(pid_ns->user_ns))
return -EPERM;
- /*
- * Writing directly to ns' last_pid field is OK, since this field
- * is volatile in a living namespace anyway and a code writing to
- * it should synchronize its usage with external means.
- */
-
next = idr_get_cursor(&pid_ns->idr) - 1;
tmp.data = &next;
--
2.41.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists