[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABCJKucm3KjYKgjP9OT4GLe8KZ3QxpRk9GqPD5JgwMaoZumnQQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 08:03:38 -0700
From: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
Cc: sashal@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, keescook@...omium.org,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>, nathan@...nel.org,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu, ndesaulniers@...gle.com,
peterz@...radead.org, ajones@...tanamicro.com, heiko@...ech.de,
prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com, liaochang1@...wei.com,
namcaov@...il.com, andy.chiu@...ive.com, guoren@...nel.org,
alexghiti@...osinc.com, Bjorn Topel <bjorn@...osinc.com>,
jeeheng.sia@...rfivetech.com, jszhang@...nel.org,
greentime.hu@...ive.com, masahiroy@...nel.org,
apatel@...tanamicro.com, mnissler@...osinc.com,
coelacanthushex@...il.com, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.4 25/25] riscv: Add CFI error handling
On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 8:33 PM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com> wrote:
> Sami probably understands the dependencies better than I do, but I don't
> think this one is sane to just backport -- there's a whole series here,
> and IIRC we had to set up some clang bits for it to work correctly.
Agreed, it doesn't really make sense to backport this patch.
Sami
Powered by blists - more mailing lists