[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <169451454934.27769.5511295733807328036.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 10:29:09 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Tim Chen" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: sched/urgent] sched/fair: Fix SMT4 group_smt_balance handling
The following commit has been merged into the sched/urgent branch of tip:
Commit-ID: ad468232c3eb1dab163672f98a1ab2363be7981e
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/ad468232c3eb1dab163672f98a1ab2363be7981e
Author: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 07 Sep 2023 10:42:21 -07:00
Committer: root <root@...sy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
CommitterDate: Sat, 09 Sep 2023 15:10:10 +02:00
sched/fair: Fix SMT4 group_smt_balance handling
For SMT4, any group with more than 2 tasks will be marked as
group_smt_balance. Retain the behaviour of group_has_spare by marking
the busiest group as the group which has the least number of idle_cpus.
Also, handle rounding effect of adding (ncores_local + ncores_busy) when
the local is fully idle and busy group imbalance is less than 2 tasks.
Local group should try to pull at least 1 task in this case so imbalance
should be set to 2 instead.
Fixes: fee1759e4f04 ("sched/fair: Determine active load balance for SMT sched groups")
Acked-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/6cd1633036bb6b651af575c32c2a9608a106702c.camel@linux.intel.com
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 12 +++++++++++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 33a2b6b..cb22592 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -9580,7 +9580,7 @@ static inline long sibling_imbalance(struct lb_env *env,
imbalance /= ncores_local + ncores_busiest;
/* Take advantage of resource in an empty sched group */
- if (imbalance == 0 && local->sum_nr_running == 0 &&
+ if (imbalance <= 1 && local->sum_nr_running == 0 &&
busiest->sum_nr_running > 1)
imbalance = 2;
@@ -9768,6 +9768,15 @@ static bool update_sd_pick_busiest(struct lb_env *env,
break;
case group_smt_balance:
+ /*
+ * Check if we have spare CPUs on either SMT group to
+ * choose has spare or fully busy handling.
+ */
+ if (sgs->idle_cpus != 0 || busiest->idle_cpus != 0)
+ goto has_spare;
+
+ fallthrough;
+
case group_fully_busy:
/*
* Select the fully busy group with highest avg_load. In
@@ -9807,6 +9816,7 @@ static bool update_sd_pick_busiest(struct lb_env *env,
else
return true;
}
+has_spare:
/*
* Select not overloaded group with lowest number of idle cpus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists