linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: imx8mp: add reserve-memory nodes for DSP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <dc402d33-88b1-e828-e6a5-2de060fbcdca@nxp.com>
Date:   Tue, 12 Sep 2023 13:51:42 +0300
From:   Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@....com>
To:     Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        "S.J. Wang" <shengjiu.wang@....com>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, conor+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
        linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        LnxRevLi <LnxRevLi@....com>,
        Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
        Mpuaudiosw <Mpuaudiosw@....com>,
        "Iuliana Prodan (OSS)" <iuliana.prodan@....nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: imx8mp: add reserve-memory nodes for DSP

On 9/12/2023 12:36 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 12/09/2023 10:49, Iuliana Prodan wrote:
>>>> Should I test this on other tree(s)?
>>> You test the patch on the tree you send it. What is the point to test it
>>> on some old code, cherry-pick with bugs and then send?
>>>
>>> If you have cross-tree dependencies between subsystem, isn't linux-next
>>> for this?
>> TBH, I don't know, that's why I asked.
>>
>> For sure one patch is for remoteproc.
>> For the other, I don't know who will pick it, but I'll tested on
>> linux-next, as you suggested.
> MAINTAINERS file (and get_maintainers.pl) will tell you. Specifically,
> this does not look really related to remoteproc patch, so it should not
> be together in one patchset.

Hi Mathieu,

I need to send a v2 - to fix the dtsi missing bracket on patch 2.
So, should I keep the 2 patches together or send them separately?

Thanks,
Iulia