[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230912121719.6i6ojvbb6ptw2i2l@box.shutemov.name>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 15:17:19 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Cc: Christopher Schramm <linux@...hramm.eu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Dionna Glaze <dionnaglaze@...gle.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 5/6] x86/sev: Add SNP-specific unaccepted memory
support
On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 11:50:15AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> > From a quick look at
> >
> > [PATCHv14 9/9] x86/tdx: Add unaccepted memory support
> >
> > it actually seems very similar for INTEL_TDX_GUEST.
> >
> > Ideally UNACCEPTED_MEMORY would not assume EFI either, but the
> > implementation actually clearly does.
>
> @Kirill, is this something you are interested in having as well?
Unaccepted memory is an EFI feature I don't see how UNACCEPTED_MEMORY can
be untied from EFI. If there's other (non-EFI) environment that has
similar concept, sure we can try to generalize it beyond EFI.
TDX guest is only runs with EFI firmware so far, so depending onf EFI and
EFI_STUB is fine for TDX>
--
Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists