[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3f91e97d95e2d8cf667071d18b4552fe13fd2b95.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 15:31:58 +0300
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>
To: Artem Savkov <asavkov@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] selftests/bpf: fix unpriv_disabled check in
test_verifier
On Tue, 2023-09-12 at 14:06 +0200, Artem Savkov wrote:
> Commit 1d56ade032a49 changed the function get_unpriv_disabled() to
> return its results as a bool instead of updating a global variable, but
> test_verifier was not updated to keep in line with these changes. Thus
> unpriv_disabled is always false in test_verifier and unprivileged tests
> are not properly skipped on systems with unprivileged bpf disabled.
>
> Fixes: 1d56ade032a49 ("selftests/bpf: Unprivileged tests for test_loader.c")
> Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@...hat.com>
Yep, my bad, without this patch test_verifier fails when
/proc/sys/kernel/unprivileged_bpf_disabled is set to 1.
Thank you for fixing it.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
> index 31f1c935cd07d..98107e0452d33 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
> @@ -1880,7 +1880,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> }
> }
>
> - get_unpriv_disabled();
> + unpriv_disabled = get_unpriv_disabled();
> if (unpriv && unpriv_disabled) {
> printf("Cannot run as unprivileged user with sysctl %s.\n",
> UNPRIV_SYSCTL);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists