[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20ef8441084c9d5fd54f84987afa77eed7fe148e.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 16:51:47 +0300
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>
To: Donglin Peng <pengdonglin@...gfor.com.cn>, martin.lau@...ux.dev,
ast@...nel.org
Cc: song@...nel.org, yhs@...com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mhiramat@...nel.org, dinghui@...gfor.com.cn,
huangcun@...gfor.com.cn, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] bpf: Using binary search to improve the
performance of btf_find_by_name_kind
On Sat, 2023-09-09 at 02:16 -0700, Donglin Peng wrote:
> Currently, we are only using the linear search method to find the type id
> by the name, which has a time complexity of O(n). This change involves
> sorting the names of btf types in ascending order and using binary search,
> which has a time complexity of O(log(n)). This idea was inspired by the
> following patch:
>
> 60443c88f3a8 ("kallsyms: Improve the performance of kallsyms_lookup_name()").
>
> At present, this improvement is only for searching in vmlinux's and
> module's BTFs, and the kind should only be BTF_KIND_FUNC or BTF_KIND_STRUCT.
>
> Another change is the search direction, where we search the BTF first and
> then its base, the type id of the first matched btf_type will be returned.
>
> Here is a time-consuming result that finding all the type ids of 67,819 kernel
> functions in vmlinux's BTF by their names:
>
> Before: 17000 ms
> After: 10 ms
>
> The average lookup performance has improved about 1700x at the above scenario.
>
> However, this change will consume more memory, for example, 67,819 kernel
> functions will allocate about 530KB memory.
Hi Donglin,
I think this is a good improvement. However, I wonder, why did you
choose to have a separate name map for each BTF kind?
I did some analysis for my local testing kernel config and got such numbers:
- total number of BTF objects: 97350
- number of FUNC and STRUCT objects: 51597
- number of FUNC, STRUCT, UNION, ENUM, ENUM64, TYPEDEF, DATASEC objects: 56817
(these are all kinds for which lookup by name might make sense)
- number of named objects: 54246
- number of name collisions:
- unique names: 53985 counts
- 2 objects with the same name: 129 counts
- 3 objects with the same name: 3 counts
So, it appears that having a single map for all named objects makes
sense and would also simplify the implementation, what do you think?
Thanks,
Eduard
>
> Signed-off-by: Donglin Peng <pengdonglin@...gfor.com.cn>
> ---
> Changes in RFC v2:
> - Fix the build issue reported by kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> ---
> include/linux/btf.h | 1 +
> kernel/bpf/btf.c | 300 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 291 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/btf.h b/include/linux/btf.h
> index cac9f304e27a..6260a0668773 100644
> --- a/include/linux/btf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/btf.h
> @@ -201,6 +201,7 @@ bool btf_is_kernel(const struct btf *btf);
> bool btf_is_module(const struct btf *btf);
> struct module *btf_try_get_module(const struct btf *btf);
> u32 btf_nr_types(const struct btf *btf);
> +u32 btf_type_cnt(const struct btf *btf);
> bool btf_member_is_reg_int(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *s,
> const struct btf_member *m,
> u32 expected_offset, u32 expected_size);
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> index 817204d53372..51aa9f27853b 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> @@ -240,6 +240,26 @@ struct btf_id_dtor_kfunc_tab {
> struct btf_id_dtor_kfunc dtors[];
> };
>
> +enum {
> + BTF_ID_NAME_FUNC, /* function */
> + BTF_ID_NAME_STRUCT, /* struct */
> + BTF_ID_NAME_MAX
> +};
> +
> +struct btf_id_name {
> + int id;
> + u32 name_off;
> +};
> +
> +struct btf_id_name_map {
> + struct btf_id_name *id_name;
> + u32 count;
> +};
> +
> +struct btf_id_name_maps {
> + struct btf_id_name_map map[BTF_ID_NAME_MAX];
> +};
> +
> struct btf {
> void *data;
> struct btf_type **types;
> @@ -257,6 +277,7 @@ struct btf {
> struct btf_kfunc_set_tab *kfunc_set_tab;
> struct btf_id_dtor_kfunc_tab *dtor_kfunc_tab;
> struct btf_struct_metas *struct_meta_tab;
> + struct btf_id_name_maps *id_name_maps;
>
> /* split BTF support */
> struct btf *base_btf;
> @@ -532,22 +553,142 @@ u32 btf_nr_types(const struct btf *btf)
> return total;
> }
>
> +u32 btf_type_cnt(const struct btf *btf)
> +{
> + return btf->start_id + btf->nr_types;
> +}
> +
> +static inline u8 btf_id_name_idx_to_kind(int index)
> +{
> + u8 kind;
> +
> + switch (index) {
> + case BTF_ID_NAME_FUNC:
> + kind = BTF_KIND_FUNC;
> + break;
> + case BTF_ID_NAME_STRUCT:
> + kind = BTF_KIND_STRUCT;
> + break;
> + default:
> + kind = BTF_KIND_UNKN;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + return kind;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int btf_id_name_kind_to_idx(u8 kind)
> +{
> + int index;
> +
> + switch (kind) {
> + case BTF_KIND_FUNC:
> + index = BTF_ID_NAME_FUNC;
> + break;
> + case BTF_KIND_STRUCT:
> + index = BTF_ID_NAME_STRUCT;
> + break;
> + default:
> + index = -1;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + return index;
> +}
> +
> +static s32 btf_find_by_name_bsearch(struct btf_id_name *id_name,
> + u32 size, const char *name,
> + struct btf_id_name **start,
> + struct btf_id_name **end,
> + const struct btf *btf)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + int low, mid, high;
> + const char *name_buf;
> +
> + low = 0;
> + high = size - 1;
> +
> + while (low <= high) {
> + mid = low + (high - low) / 2;
> + name_buf = btf_name_by_offset(btf, id_name[mid].name_off);
> + ret = strcmp(name, name_buf);
> + if (ret > 0)
> + low = mid + 1;
> + else if (ret < 0)
> + high = mid - 1;
> + else
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (low > high)
> + return -ESRCH;
> +
> + if (start) {
> + low = mid;
> + while (low) {
> + name_buf = btf_name_by_offset(btf, id_name[low-1].name_off);
> + if (strcmp(name, name_buf))
> + break;
> + low--;
> + }
> + *start = &id_name[low];
> + }
> +
> + if (end) {
> + high = mid;
> + while (high < size - 1) {
> + name_buf = btf_name_by_offset(btf, id_name[high+1].name_off);
> + if (strcmp(name, name_buf))
> + break;
> + high++;
> + }
> + *end = &id_name[high];
> + }
> +
> + return id_name[mid].id;
> +}
> +
> s32 btf_find_by_name_kind(const struct btf *btf, const char *name, u8 kind)
> {
> + const struct btf_id_name_maps *maps;
> + const struct btf_id_name_map *map;
> + struct btf_id_name *start;
> const struct btf_type *t;
> const char *tname;
> - u32 i, total;
> + int index = btf_id_name_kind_to_idx(kind);
> + s32 id, total;
>
> - total = btf_nr_types(btf);
> - for (i = 1; i < total; i++) {
> - t = btf_type_by_id(btf, i);
> - if (BTF_INFO_KIND(t->info) != kind)
> - continue;
> + do {
> + maps = btf->id_name_maps;
> + if (index >= 0 && maps && maps->map[index].id_name) {
> + /* binary search */
> + map = &maps->map[index];
> + id = btf_find_by_name_bsearch(map->id_name,
> + map->count, name, &start, NULL, btf);
> + if (id > 0) {
> + /*
> + * Return the first one that
> + * matched
> + */
> + return start->id;
> + }
> + } else {
> + /* linear search */
> + total = btf_type_cnt(btf);
> + for (id = btf->start_id; id < total; id++) {
> + t = btf_type_by_id(btf, id);
> + if (BTF_INFO_KIND(t->info) != kind)
> + continue;
> +
> + tname = btf_name_by_offset(btf, t->name_off);
> + if (!strcmp(tname, name))
> + return id;
> + }
> + }
>
> - tname = btf_name_by_offset(btf, t->name_off);
> - if (!strcmp(tname, name))
> - return i;
> - }
> + btf = btf->base_btf;
> + } while (btf);
>
> return -ENOENT;
> }
> @@ -1639,6 +1780,32 @@ static void btf_free_id(struct btf *btf)
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&btf_idr_lock, flags);
> }
>
> +static void btf_destroy_id_name(struct btf *btf, int index)
> +{
> + struct btf_id_name_maps *maps = btf->id_name_maps;
> + struct btf_id_name_map *map = &maps->map[index];
> +
> + if (map->id_name) {
> + kvfree(map->id_name);
> + map->id_name = NULL;
> + map->count = 0;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void btf_destroy_id_name_map(struct btf *btf)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + if (!btf->id_name_maps)
> + return;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < BTF_ID_NAME_MAX; i++)
> + btf_destroy_id_name(btf, i);
> +
> + kfree(btf->id_name_maps);
> + btf->id_name_maps = NULL;
> +}
> +
> static void btf_free_kfunc_set_tab(struct btf *btf)
> {
> struct btf_kfunc_set_tab *tab = btf->kfunc_set_tab;
> @@ -1689,6 +1856,7 @@ static void btf_free_struct_meta_tab(struct btf *btf)
>
> static void btf_free(struct btf *btf)
> {
> + btf_destroy_id_name_map(btf);
> btf_free_struct_meta_tab(btf);
> btf_free_dtor_kfunc_tab(btf);
> btf_free_kfunc_set_tab(btf);
> @@ -5713,6 +5881,107 @@ int get_kern_ctx_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_log *log, enum bpf_prog_type prog_ty
> return kctx_type_id;
> }
>
> +static int btf_compare_id_name(const void *a, const void *b, const void *priv)
> +{
> + const struct btf_id_name *ia = (const struct btf_id_name *)a;
> + const struct btf_id_name *ib = (const struct btf_id_name *)b;
> + const struct btf *btf = priv;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /*
> + * Sort names in ascending order, if the name is same, sort ids in
> + * ascending order.
> + */
> + ret = strcmp(btf_name_by_offset(btf, ia->name_off),
> + btf_name_by_offset(btf, ib->name_off));
> + if (!ret)
> + ret = ia->id - ib->id;
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int btf_create_id_name(struct btf *btf, int index)
> +{
> + struct btf_id_name_maps *maps = btf->id_name_maps;
> + struct btf_id_name_map *map = &maps->map[index];
> + const struct btf_type *t;
> + struct btf_id_name *id_name;
> + const char *name;
> + int i, j = 0;
> + u32 total, count = 0;
> + u8 kind;
> +
> + kind = btf_id_name_idx_to_kind(index);
> + if (kind == BTF_KIND_UNKN)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (map->id_name || map->count != 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + total = btf_type_cnt(btf);
> + for (i = btf->start_id; i < total; i++) {
> + t = btf_type_by_id(btf, i);
> + if (BTF_INFO_KIND(t->info) != kind)
> + continue;
> + name = btf_name_by_offset(btf, t->name_off);
> + if (str_is_empty(name))
> + continue;
> + count++;
> + }
> +
> + if (count == 0)
> + return 0;
> +
> + id_name = kvcalloc(count, sizeof(struct btf_id_name),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!id_name)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + for (i = btf->start_id; i < total; i++) {
> + t = btf_type_by_id(btf, i);
> + if (BTF_INFO_KIND(t->info) != kind)
> + continue;
> + name = btf_name_by_offset(btf, t->name_off);
> + if (str_is_empty(name))
> + continue;
> +
> + id_name[j].id = i;
> + id_name[j].name_off = t->name_off;
> + j++;
> + }
> +
> + sort_r(id_name, count, sizeof(id_name[0]), btf_compare_id_name,
> + NULL, btf);
> +
> + map->id_name = id_name;
> + map->count = count;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int btf_create_id_name_map(struct btf *btf)
> +{
> + int err, i;
> + struct btf_id_name_maps *maps;
> +
> + if (btf->id_name_maps)
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
> + maps = kzalloc(sizeof(struct btf_id_name_maps), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!maps)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + btf->id_name_maps = maps;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < BTF_ID_NAME_MAX; i++) {
> + err = btf_create_id_name(btf, i);
> + if (err < 0)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> BTF_ID_LIST(bpf_ctx_convert_btf_id)
> BTF_ID(struct, bpf_ctx_convert)
>
> @@ -5760,6 +6029,10 @@ struct btf *btf_parse_vmlinux(void)
> if (err)
> goto errout;
>
> + err = btf_create_id_name_map(btf);
> + if (err)
> + goto errout;
> +
> /* btf_parse_vmlinux() runs under bpf_verifier_lock */
> bpf_ctx_convert.t = btf_type_by_id(btf, bpf_ctx_convert_btf_id[0]);
>
> @@ -5777,6 +6050,7 @@ struct btf *btf_parse_vmlinux(void)
> errout:
> btf_verifier_env_free(env);
> if (btf) {
> + btf_destroy_id_name_map(btf);
> kvfree(btf->types);
> kfree(btf);
> }
> @@ -5844,13 +6118,19 @@ static struct btf *btf_parse_module(const char *module_name, const void *data, u
> if (err)
> goto errout;
>
> + err = btf_create_id_name_map(btf);
> + if (err)
> + goto errout;
> +
> btf_verifier_env_free(env);
> refcount_set(&btf->refcnt, 1);
> +
> return btf;
>
> errout:
> btf_verifier_env_free(env);
> if (btf) {
> + btf_destroy_id_name_map(btf);
> kvfree(btf->data);
> kvfree(btf->types);
> kfree(btf);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists