[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230912153221.lSL8YgJJ@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 17:32:21 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com, corbet@....net,
qyousef@...alina.io, chris.hyser@...cle.com,
patrick.bellasi@...bug.net, pjt@...gle.com, pavel@....cz,
qperret@...gle.com, tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com, joshdon@...gle.com,
timj@....org, kprateek.nayak@....com, yu.c.chen@...el.com,
youssefesmat@...omium.org, joel@...lfernandes.org, efault@....de,
tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/15] sched/smp: Use lag to simplify cross-runqueue
placement
On 2023-05-31 13:58:46 [+0200], Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -12492,22 +12440,9 @@ static void task_fork_fair(struct task_s
>
> cfs_rq = task_cfs_rq(current);
> curr = cfs_rq->curr;
> - if (curr) {
> + if (curr)
> update_curr(cfs_rq);
> - se->vruntime = curr->vruntime;
> - }
> place_entity(cfs_rq, se, 1);
> -
> - if (sysctl_sched_child_runs_first && curr && entity_before(curr, se)) {
Since the removal of sysctl_sched_child_runs_first there is no user of
this anymore. There is still the sysctl file sched_child_runs_first with
no functionality.
Is this intended or should it be removed?
…
> rq_unlock(rq, &rf);
> }
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists