[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <CVGF1AQT9WI4.2660NVII9NIDU@suppilovahvero>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 00:45:35 +0300
From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: "Michal Suchanek" <msuchanek@...e.de>,
<linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: "Mimi Zohar" <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Dmitry Kasatkin" <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>,
"Paul Moore" <paul@...l-moore.com>,
"James Morris" <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "joeyli" <jlee@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] integrity: powerpc: Do not select CA_MACHINE_KEYRING
On Thu Sep 7, 2023 at 7:52 PM EEST, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> No other platform needs CA_MACHINE_KEYRING, either.
>
> This is policy that should be decided by the administrator, not Kconfig
s/administrator/distributor/ ?
> dependencies.
>
> cc: joeyli <jlee@...e.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de>
> ---
> security/integrity/Kconfig | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/integrity/Kconfig b/security/integrity/Kconfig
> index 232191ee09e3..b6e074ac0227 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/Kconfig
> +++ b/security/integrity/Kconfig
> @@ -68,8 +68,6 @@ config INTEGRITY_MACHINE_KEYRING
> depends on INTEGRITY_ASYMMETRIC_KEYS
> depends on SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING
> depends on LOAD_UEFI_KEYS || LOAD_PPC_KEYS
> - select INTEGRITY_CA_MACHINE_KEYRING if LOAD_PPC_KEYS
> - select INTEGRITY_CA_MACHINE_KEYRING_MAX if LOAD_PPC_KEYS
> help
> If set, provide a keyring to which Machine Owner Keys (MOK) may
> be added. This keyring shall contain just MOK keys. Unlike keys
> --
> 2.41.0
I'd suggest to add even fixes tag.
BR, Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists