[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230912181010.615d6b79@fedora>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 18:10:10 +0200
From: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Oleksij Rempel <linux@...pel-privat.de>,
Nicolò Veronese <nicveronese@...il.com>,
thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 1/7] net: phy: introduce phy numbering and
phy namespaces
Hello,
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 17:41:31 +0200
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
> > Introduce a numbering scheme allowing to enumerate PHY devices that
> > belong to any netdev, which can in turn allow userspace to take more
> > precise decisions with regard to each PHY's configuration.
>
> A minor point, and i know naming is hard, but i keep reading _ns_ and
> think namespace, as in ip netns. Maybe we should think of something
> other than ns.
Yeah that was the initial idea, to imply that the numering is
independent between netdevices... I thought about "phy_list", "phys",
"phy_devices" but none of that felt correct :(
Any idea here would be welcome :D
Maxime
> Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists