[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1700871a-882a-b7c4-a33d-7466d92f728b@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 11:53:05 -0500
From: "Moger, Babu" <babu.moger@....com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>, corbet@....net,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de
Cc: fenghua.yu@...el.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, paulmck@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
quic_neeraju@...cinc.com, rdunlap@...radead.org,
damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com, songmuchun@...edance.com,
peterz@...radead.org, jpoimboe@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com,
chang.seok.bae@...el.com, pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com,
jmattson@...gle.com, daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com,
sandipan.das@....com, tony.luck@...el.com, james.morse@....com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bagasdotme@...il.com, eranian@...gle.com,
christophe.leroy@...roup.eu, jarkko@...nel.org,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, quic_jiles@...cinc.com,
peternewman@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/9] x86/resctrl: Miscellaneous resctrl features
Hi Reinette,
On 9/11/23 18:08, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Babu,
>
> On 9/7/2023 4:51 PM, Babu Moger wrote:
>> These series adds support few minor features.
>> 1. Support assigning multiple tasks to control/mon groups in one command.
>> 2. Add debug mount option for resctrl interface.
>> 3. Add RMID and CLOSID in resctrl interface when mounted with debug option.
>> 4. Moves the default control group creation during the mount instead of during init.
>> 5. While doing these above changes, found that rftype flags needed some cleanup.
>> They were named inconsistently. Re-arranged them much more cleanly now and added
>> few comments. Hope it can help future additions.
>> ---
>> v9:
>> Changes since v8:
>> Split the RMID display in a separate patch. RMID is a special case here as it
>> should be printed only if monitoring is enabled.
>> Made rdtgroup_setup_root and rdtgroup_destroy_root as static functions.
>> Added code to print pid_str in case of task parse error.
>
> fyi ... I found this version difficult to review. The cover letter contained this
> high level list of changes while some patches were changed without getting a mention
> here nor in patch-specific list of changes. I ended up needing to do a diff with the
> previous version to get an idea of what actually changed.
Yes. My bad. Should have listed the changes on each patch. Sure. Will do
next time.
thanks
Babu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists