[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3f1f1679-2d0a-d501-da9c-cb38088acef2@collabora.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 13:56:49 -0300
From: Helen Koike <helen.koike@...labora.com>
To: Vignesh Raman <vignesh.raman@...labora.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: guilherme.gallo@...labora.com, sergi.blanch.torne@...labora.com,
david.heidelberg@...labora.com, daniels@...labora.com,
gustavo.padovan@...labora.com,
angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com, emma@...olt.net,
robclark@...edesktop.org, robdclark@...gle.com, anholt@...gle.com,
robdclark@...il.com, airlied@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch,
jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com, mripard@...nel.org,
dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/9] arm64: defconfig: Enable DA9211 regulator
On 08/09/2023 12:22, Vignesh Raman wrote:
> Mediatek mt8173 board fails to boot with DA9211 regulator disabled.
> Enabling CONFIG_REGULATOR_DA9211=y in drm-ci fixes the issue.
>
> So enable it in the defconfig since kernel-ci also requires it.
tbh, =m doesn't solve for mesa-ci (since we don't use an initrd, not
sure if it solves for kernel-ci.
>
> Suggested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raman <vignesh.raman@...labora.co
In any case:
Acked-by: Helen Koike <helen.koike@...labora.com>
> ---
>
> v3:
> - New patch in the series to enable CONFIG_REGULATOR_DA9211 in defconfig
>
> ---
> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> index a25d783dfb95..ef22b532b63a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> @@ -711,6 +711,7 @@ CONFIG_REGULATOR_AXP20X=y
> CONFIG_REGULATOR_BD718XX=y
> CONFIG_REGULATOR_BD9571MWV=y
> CONFIG_REGULATOR_CROS_EC=y
> +CONFIG_REGULATOR_DA9211=m
Question for the maintainers: would it be acceptable to make it a =y
instead of =m here ? Since this is something required for booting.
Regards,
Helen
> CONFIG_REGULATOR_FAN53555=y
> CONFIG_REGULATOR_GPIO=y
> CONFIG_REGULATOR_HI6421V530=y
Powered by blists - more mailing lists