[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZQDK4kZhwyZL/8tx@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 17:32:34 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>
Cc: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@...wei.com>, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, mark.rutland@....com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
namhyung@...nel.org, irogers@...gle.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
kan.liang@...ux.intel.com, james.clark@....com,
tmricht@...ux.ibm.com, ak@...ux.intel.com,
anshuman.khandual@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/6] perf record: Track sideband events for all CPUs
when tracing selected CPUs
Em Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 02:41:56PM +0530, Ravi Bangoria escreveu:
> On 04-Sep-23 8:03 AM, Yang Jihong wrote:
> > User space tasks can migrate between CPUs, track sideband events for all
> > CPUs.
> >
> > The specific scenarios are as follows:
> >
> > CPU0 CPU1
> > perf record -C 0 start
> > taskA starts to be created and executed
> > -> PERF_RECORD_COMM and PERF_RECORD_MMAP
> > events only deliver to CPU1
> > ......
> > |
> > migrate to CPU0
> > |
> > Running on CPU0 <----------/
> > ...
> >
> > perf record -C 0 stop
> >
> > Now perf samples the PC of taskA. However, perf does not record the
> > PERF_RECORD_COMM and PERF_RECORD_COMM events of taskA.
> > Therefore, the comm and symbols of taskA cannot be parsed.
> >
> > The sys_perf_event_open invoked is as follows:
> >
> > # perf --debug verbose=3 record -e cpu-clock -C 1 true
> > <SNIP>
> > Opening: cpu-clock
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > perf_event_attr:
> > type 1 (PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE)
> > size 136
> > config 0 (PERF_COUNT_SW_CPU_CLOCK)
> > { sample_period, sample_freq } 4000
> > sample_type IP|TID|TIME|CPU|PERIOD|IDENTIFIER
> > read_format ID|LOST
> > disabled 1
> > inherit 1
> > freq 1
> > sample_id_all 1
> > exclude_guest 1
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > sys_perf_event_open: pid -1 cpu 1 group_fd -1 flags 0x8 = 5
> > Opening: dummy:u
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > perf_event_attr:
> > type 1 (PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE)
> > size 136
> > config 0x9 (PERF_COUNT_SW_DUMMY)
> > { sample_period, sample_freq } 1
> > sample_type IP|TID|TIME|CPU|IDENTIFIER
> > read_format ID|LOST
> > inherit 1
> > exclude_kernel 1
> > exclude_hv 1
> > mmap 1
> > comm 1
> > task 1
> > sample_id_all 1
> > exclude_guest 1
> > mmap2 1
> > comm_exec 1
> > ksymbol 1
> > bpf_event 1
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > sys_perf_event_open: pid -1 cpu 0 group_fd -1 flags 0x8 = 6
> > sys_perf_event_open: pid -1 cpu 1 group_fd -1 flags 0x8 = 7
> > sys_perf_event_open: pid -1 cpu 2 group_fd -1 flags 0x8 = 9
> > sys_perf_event_open: pid -1 cpu 3 group_fd -1 flags 0x8 = 10
> > sys_perf_event_open: pid -1 cpu 4 group_fd -1 flags 0x8 = 11
> > sys_perf_event_open: pid -1 cpu 5 group_fd -1 flags 0x8 = 12
> > sys_perf_event_open: pid -1 cpu 6 group_fd -1 flags 0x8 = 13
> > sys_perf_event_open: pid -1 cpu 7 group_fd -1 flags 0x8 = 14
> > <SNIP>
> >
> > Changes since_v7:
> > - The condition for requiring system_wide sideband is changed to
> > "as long as a non-dummy event exists" (patch4).
> > - Modify the corresponding test case to record only dummy event (patch6).
> > - Thanks to tested-by tag from Ravi, but because the solution is modified,
> > the tested-by tag of Ravi is not added to this version.
>
> I've re-tested v8 with my simple test.
>
> Tested-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>
Thanks, applied to the csets that were still sitting in an umpublished
perf-tools-next local branch, soon public.
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists