linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: cheza doesn't support LMh node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD=FV=XYdvcF2mo9=-EBb4Ann1UAM1VFW61MH3yOWjyLqCJRiw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 12 Sep 2023 16:30:31 -0700
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>
Cc:     cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@...aro.org>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: cheza doesn't support
 LMh node

Hi,

On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 12:14 AM David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz> wrote:
>
> Cheza firmware doesn't allow controlling LMh from the operating system.
>
> Fixes: 36c6581214c4 ("arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Add support for LMh node")
> Suggested-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>
> ---
> v2:
>  - moved power-domains removal from this patch to previous one, since
>    it's not related to LMh support
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-cheza.dtsi | 12 ++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

I haven't used a cheza in years, but this seems reasonable to me.

Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>