lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230911140439.b273bf9e120881f038da0de7@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 11 Sep 2023 14:04:39 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
Cc:     Chuck Lever <cel@...nel.org>,
        Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
        Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@...cle.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 11/17] lib: add light-weight queuing mechanism.

On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 20:30:40 +0000 Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@...cle.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> > On Sep 11, 2023, at 2:13 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 10:39:43 -0400 Chuck Lever <cel@...nel.org> wrote:
> > 
> >> lwq is a FIFO single-linked queue that only requires a spinlock
> >> for dequeueing, which happens in process context.  Enqueueing is atomic
> >> with no spinlock and can happen in any context.
> > 
> > What is the advantage of this over using one of the library
> > facilities which we already have?
> 
> I'll let the patch author respond to that question, but let me pose
> one of my own: What pre-existing facilities are you thinking of, so
> that I may have a look?

Well, I assume that plain old list_heads could be recruited for this
requirement.  And I hope that a FIFO could be implemented using kfifo ;)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ