linux-kernel - Re: [RFT PATCH 05/15] drm/mediatek: Call drm_atomic_helper

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAC=S1njNfjOaSidUHSGPKC+-625Ysx66wx9Sk02ZXGvpUKYBbA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 12 Sep 2023 14:28:32 +0800
From:   Fei Shao <fshao@...omium.org>
To:     Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:     dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, airlied@...il.com,
        angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com, chunkuang.hu@...nel.org,
        daniel@...ll.ch, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        matthias.bgg@...il.com, p.zabel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH 05/15] drm/mediatek: Call drm_atomic_helper_shutdown()
 at shutdown time

On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 12:11 AM Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
>
[...]
>
> That makes sense. I had based this series on drm-misc-next which
> didn't have those, but now that a new -rc1 is out it then
> drm-misc-next should rebase shortly. I'll make sure that the next
> version includes Uwe's changes as much as possible.
>
> That being said, I also wouldn't object if the maintainer of this DRM
> driver wanted to resolve conflicts themselves and land the patch
> without me needing to resend. The conflict is trivial, there are no
> dependencies and no reason to land the series all at once, so landing
> this patch early would mean less spam for the maintainer since they
> would no longer get CCed on future versions. :-P Just sayin...

Oh then feel free to ignore that if the changes weren't in the tree at
that time... It was just a gentle reminder. Thanks for clarifying.  :)

Regards,
Fei

>
> -Doug