[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <gjyv2lwrrw3n5n3olcedjjvhbyqqikic5fvuquc74srybgylq5@uxpvgadeuhhp>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 08:34:21 +0200
From: Maciej Wieczór-Retman
<maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
CC: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
<ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v3 2/2] selftests/resctrl: Move run_benchmark() to
a more fitting file
Hi,
On 2023-09-11 at 09:59:31 -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>Hi Maciej,
>
>On 9/1/2023 6:42 AM, Wieczor-Retman Maciej wrote:
>> resctrlfs.c file contains mostly functions that interact in some way
>
>This can just be "resctrlfs.c contains ..." (no need for "file")
Right, sorry, I'll correct this and the one below.
>> with resctrl FS entries while functions inside resctrl_val.c deal with
>> measurements and benchmarking.
>>
>> run_benchmark() is located in resctrlfs.c file even though it's
>
>same here
>
>> purpose is not interacting with the resctrl FS but to execute cache
>> checking logic.
>>
>> Move run_benchmark() to resctrl_val.c just before resctrl_val() that
>> makes use of run_benchmark(). Make run_benchmark() static since it's
>> not used between multiple files anymore.
>>
>> Remove return comment from kernel-doc since the function is type void.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wieczor-Retman Maciej <maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
>
>Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
>
>Reinette
Thank you for the review!
--
Kind regards
Maciej Wieczór-Retman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists