[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230912065501.838955709@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 09:58:10 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@...e.com>
Subject: [patch V3 17/30] x86/microcode: Clean up mc_cpu_down_prep()
This function has nothing to do with suspend. It's a hotplug
callback. Remove the bogus comment.
Drop the pointless debug printk. The hotplug core provides tracepoints
which track the invocation of those callbacks.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
V2: New patch
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c | 8 +-------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
@@ -569,16 +569,10 @@ static int mc_cpu_online(unsigned int cp
static int mc_cpu_down_prep(unsigned int cpu)
{
- struct device *dev;
-
- dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
+ struct device *dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
microcode_fini_cpu(cpu);
-
- /* Suspend is in progress, only remove the interface */
sysfs_remove_group(&dev->kobj, &mc_attr_group);
- pr_debug("%s: CPU%d\n", __func__, cpu);
-
return 0;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists