[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWKwdxjRf031aD=Ko7vRdvFW-OR48QAc=ZFy=FP_LNAoA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 10:23:37 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: paulmck@...nel.org
Cc: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] maple_tree: Disable mas_wr_append() when other
readers are possible
Hi Paul,
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 10:14 AM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 07:54:52PM -0400, Liam R. Howlett wrote:
> > * Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org> [230906 14:03]:
> > > On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 01:29:54PM -0400, Liam R. Howlett wrote:
> > > > * Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org> [230906 13:24]:
> > > > > On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 11:23:25AM -0400, Liam R. Howlett wrote:
> > > > > > (Adding Paul & Shanker to Cc list.. please see below for why)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Apologies on the late response, I was away and have been struggling to
> > > > > > get a working PPC32 test environment.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> [230829 12:42]:
> > > > > > > Hi Liam,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, 18 Aug 2023, Liam R. Howlett wrote:
> > > > > > > > The current implementation of append may cause duplicate data and/or
> > > > > > > > incorrect ranges to be returned to a reader during an update. Although
> > > > > > > > this has not been reported or seen, disable the append write operation
> > > > > > > > while the tree is in rcu mode out of an abundance of caution.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ...
> > > > > > > >
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > > > > > RCU-related configs:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > $ grep RCU .config
> > > > > > > # RCU Subsystem
> > > > > > > CONFIG_TINY_RCU=y
>
> I must have been asleep last time I looked at this. I was looking at
> Tree RCU. Please accept my apologies for my lapse. :-/
>
> However, Tiny RCU's call_rcu() also avoids enabling IRQs, so I would
> have said the same thing, albeit after looking at a lot less RCU code.
>
> TL;DR:
>
> 1. Try making the __setup_irq() function's call to mutex_lock()
> instead be as follows:
>
> if (!mutex_trylock(&desc->request_mutex))
> mutex_lock(&desc->request_mutex);
>
> This might fail if __setup_irq() has other dependencies on a
> fully operational scheduler.
>
> 2. Move that ppc32 call to __setup_irq() much later, most definitely
> after interrupts have been enabled and the scheduler is fully
> operational. Invoking mutex_lock() before that time is not a
> good idea. ;-)
There is no call to __setup_irq() from arch/powerpc/?
Note that there are (possibly different) issues seen on ppc32 and on arm32
(Renesas RZ/A in particular, but not on other Renesas ARM systems).
I saw an issue on arm32 with cfeb6ae8bcb96ccf, but not with cfeb6ae8bcb96ccf^.
Other people saw an issue on ppc32 with both cfeb6ae8bcb96ccf and
cfeb6ae8bcb96ccf^.
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists