[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230912085923.27238-1-liujinlong@kylinos.cn>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 16:59:23 +0800
From: liujinlong <liujinlong@...inos.cn>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: liujinlong <liujinlong@...inos.cn>
Subject: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: modify an easily misunderstood function name
When looking at the code in the memory part, I found that the purpose of
the function prepare_scan_countis very different from the function name.
It is easy to misunderstand when reading.The function prepare_scan_count
mainly completes the assignment of the scan_control structure.Therefore,
I suggest that the function name can be changed to prepare_scan_control,
which is easier to understand.
Signed-off-by: liujinlong <liujinlong@...inos.cn>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 6f13394b112ea..4e1d2b8ced91a 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2909,7 +2909,7 @@ enum scan_balance {
SCAN_FILE,
};
-static void prepare_scan_count(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
+static void prepare_scan_control(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
{
unsigned long file;
struct lruvec *target_lruvec;
@@ -6535,7 +6535,7 @@ static void shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
nr_reclaimed = sc->nr_reclaimed;
nr_scanned = sc->nr_scanned;
- prepare_scan_count(pgdat, sc);
+ prepare_scan_control(pgdat, sc);
shrink_node_memcgs(pgdat, sc);
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists