[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZQAnrcYBfhLu-vbd@titan>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 18:56:13 +1000
From: John Watts <contact@...kia.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Chris Morgan <macromorgan@...mail.com>,
Jagan Teki <jagan@...eble.ai>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 8/8] dt-bindings: display: panel: add Fascontek
FS035VG158 panel
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 08:55:31AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 11/09/2023 18:47, John Watts wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 01:49:39PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> If the other panel has exactly the same case, then yes, you can do like
> >> this. But it depends on the bindings - to which ones do you refer as
> >> your tmeplate?
> >
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/leadtek,ltk035c5444t.yaml
>
> The file is indeed serving as poor example.
I'm happy to fix it up according to your response and include it in v2 of the RFC.
Should this be split in to two RFCs- one for cleanup, one for the new panel?
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
John.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists