[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4b7c8e8a-b97f-6e1e-7c49-889fdd5b921f@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 18:07:15 +0800
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH 2/3] gpio: eic-sprd: use a helper variable for
&pdev->dev
On 9/12/2023 5:45 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
>
> Instead of dereferencing pdev everywhere, just store the address of the
> underlying struct device in a local variable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-eic-sprd.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-eic-sprd.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-eic-sprd.c
> index 9b2f9ccf8d77..be7f2fa5aa7b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-eic-sprd.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-eic-sprd.c
> @@ -591,18 +591,19 @@ static void sprd_eic_unregister_notifier(void *data)
> static int sprd_eic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> const struct sprd_eic_variant_data *pdata;
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> struct gpio_irq_chip *irq;
> struct sprd_eic *sprd_eic;
> struct resource *res;
> int ret, i;
>
> - pdata = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> + pdata = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> if (!pdata) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No matching driver data found.\n");
> + dev_err(dev, "No matching driver data found.\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - sprd_eic = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*sprd_eic), GFP_KERNEL);
> + sprd_eic = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*sprd_eic), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!sprd_eic)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> @@ -624,7 +625,7 @@ static int sprd_eic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (!res)
> break;
>
> - sprd_eic->base[i] = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
> + sprd_eic->base[i] = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> if (IS_ERR(sprd_eic->base[i]))
> return PTR_ERR(sprd_eic->base[i]);
> }
> @@ -632,7 +633,7 @@ static int sprd_eic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> sprd_eic->chip.label = sprd_eic_label_name[sprd_eic->type];
> sprd_eic->chip.ngpio = pdata->num_eics;
> sprd_eic->chip.base = -1;
> - sprd_eic->chip.parent = &pdev->dev;
> + sprd_eic->chip.parent = dev;
> sprd_eic->chip.direction_input = sprd_eic_direction_input;
> switch (sprd_eic->type) {
> case SPRD_EIC_DEBOUNCE:
> @@ -659,9 +660,9 @@ static int sprd_eic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> irq->num_parents = 1;
> irq->parents = &sprd_eic->irq;
>
> - ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, &sprd_eic->chip, sprd_eic);
> + ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(dev, &sprd_eic->chip, sprd_eic);
> if (ret < 0) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Could not register gpiochip %d.\n", ret);
> + dev_err(dev, "Could not register gpiochip %d.\n", ret);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -669,11 +670,10 @@ static int sprd_eic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> ret = atomic_notifier_chain_register(&sprd_eic_irq_notifier,
> &sprd_eic->irq_nb);
> if (ret)
> - return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret,
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> "Failed to register with the interrupt notifier");
>
> - return devm_add_action_or_reset(&pdev->dev,
> - sprd_eic_unregister_notifier,
> + return devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, sprd_eic_unregister_notifier,
> &sprd_eic->irq_nb);
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists