[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230912100727.23197-12-brgl@bgdev.pl>
Date:   Tue, 12 Sep 2023 12:07:27 +0200
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 11/11] gpio: sysfs: drop the mention of gpiochip_find() from sysfs code
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
We have removed all callers of gpiochip_find() so don't mention it in
gpiolib-sysfs.c.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c
index 50503a4525eb..6f309a3b2d9a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c
@@ -814,7 +814,7 @@ static int __init gpiolib_sysfs_init(void)
 		 * gpiochip_sysfs_register() acquires a mutex. This is unsafe
 		 * and needs to be fixed.
 		 *
-		 * Also it would be nice to use gpiochip_find() here so we
+		 * Also it would be nice to use gpio_device_find() here so we
 		 * can keep gpio_chips local to gpiolib.c, but the yield of
 		 * gpio_lock prevents us from doing this.
 		 */
-- 
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
