lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <588db15e-62f1-ca9e-211c-21d58e15bd73@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 13 Sep 2023 17:45:54 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Parthiban.Veerasooran@...rochip.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        Horatiu.Vultur@...rochip.com, Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com,
        Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
        Thorsten.Kummermehr@...rochip.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        conor+dt@...nel.org, corbet@....net, Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com,
        rdunlap@...radead.org, horms@...nel.org, casper.casan@...il.com,
        andrew@...n.ch
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/6] Add support for OPEN Alliance 10BASE-T1x
 MACPHY Serial Interface

On 13/09/2023 15:26, Parthiban.Veerasooran@...rochip.com wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> On 10/09/23 4:25 pm, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>>
>> On 08/09/2023 16:29, Parthiban Veerasooran wrote:
>>> This patch series contain the below updates,
>>> - Adds support for OPEN Alliance 10BASE-T1x MACPHY Serial Interface in the
>>>    net/ethernet/oa_tc6.c.
>>> - Adds driver support for Microchip LAN8650/1 Rev.B0 10BASE-T1S MACPHY
>>>    Ethernet driver in the net/ethernet/microchip/lan865x.c.
>>
>> And why is this RFC? Do you mean by that it is buggy and not finished,
>> so we should not review?
> 
> No, this is not a buggy/unfinished patch series. I have added RFC as 

I don't understand how people name their stuff RFC. Some send totally
buggy and untested bindings under RFC and, after receiving feedback,
respond surprised - it was just RFC!

Other send RFC and expect review.

Just call it a PATCH. PATCH is Requesting for Comments.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ