[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230913025342.1460157-1-mwkim@gaonchips.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 11:53:43 +0900
From: Myunguk Kim <mwkim@...nchips.com>
To: krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, broonie@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, fido_max@...ox.ru,
joabreu@...opsys.com, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com, lgirdwood@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mwkim@...nchips.com, perex@...ex.cz,
robh+dt@...nel.org, tiwai@...e.com, u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de,
xingyu.wu@...rfivetech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dwc: Add Single DMA mode support
> Bindings are always separate patch.
Okay, I will send v2.
> This was not tested. Missing vendor prefix, type.
>
> Anyway please provide some explanation why this cannot be deduced from
> the compatible.
This is not dependent on a specific vendor,
but is intended to describe
the properties of the signal(single/burst request) connection
relationship between i2s and dma.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists