[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230913-depress-bootlace-6b88bfd83966@spud>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 19:30:22 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Romain Perier <romain.perier@...il.com>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Daniel Palmer <daniel@...f.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: rtc: Add Mstar SSD202D RTC
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 05:16:05PM +0200, Romain Perier wrote:
> Add YAML bindings for Mstar SSD202D RTC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@...il.com>
> ---
> .../bindings/rtc/mstar,ssd202d-rtc.yaml | 35 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/mstar,ssd202d-rtc.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/mstar,ssd202d-rtc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/mstar,ssd202d-rtc.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..4c1f22ef5a2c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/mstar,ssd202d-rtc.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/rtc/mstar,ssd202d-rtc.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Mstar SSD202D Real Time Clock
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Daniel Palmer <daniel@...f.com>
> + - Romain Perier <romain.perier@...il.com>
> +
> +allOf:
> + - $ref: rtc.yaml#
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + enum:
> + - mstar,ssd202d-rtc
> + reg:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
So, this seems fine to me in isolation, but isn't this now the sort of
thing that can be documented in trivial-rtc.yaml?
Its only got compatible & reg, which seems to fit the bill for that.
Apologies if I am missing something,
Conor.
> +
> +unevaluatedProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + rtc@...0 {
> + compatible = "mstar,ssd202d-rtc";
> + reg = <0x6800 0x200>;
> + };
> +...
> --
> 2.39.2
>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists