[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230913222338.07d1625b@xps-13>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 22:23:38 +0200
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
Harvey Hunt <harveyhuntnexus@...il.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] mtd: rawnand: ingenic: use gpiod_set_active_high()
Hi Andy,
linus.walleij@...aro.org wrote on Wed, 13 Sep 2023 22:12:40 +0200:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 10:05 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 2:50 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
> > >
> > > Use the new, less cumbersome interface for setting the GPIO as
> > > active-high that doesn't require first checking the current state.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > * here for older DTs so we can re-use the generic nand_gpio_waitrdy()
> > > * helper, and be consistent with what other drivers do.
> > > */
> > > - if (of_machine_is_compatible("qi,lb60") &&
> > > - gpiod_is_active_low(nand->busy_gpio))
> > > - gpiod_toggle_active_low(nand->busy_gpio);
> > > + if (of_machine_is_compatible("qi,lb60"))
> > > + gpiod_set_active_high(nand->busy_gpio);
> >
> > Why not moving this quirk to gpiolib-of.c?
>
> That's a better idea here I think, it's clearly a quirk for a
> buggy device tree.
Agreed, it's just for backward compatibility purposes in a single
driver. I believe it should stay here.
Thanks,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists