linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH V1 4/6] sched/numa: Increase tasks' access history

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZQFmAP5ydscmmTAq@xsang-OptiPlex-9020>
Date:   Wed, 13 Sep 2023 15:34:24 +0800
From:   Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@...el.com>
To:     Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@....com>
CC:     <oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev>, <lkp@...el.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <ying.huang@...el.com>,
        <feng.tang@...el.com>, <fengwei.yin@...el.com>,
        <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>, <yu.c.chen@...el.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, <rppt@...nel.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Bharata B Rao <bharata@....com>,
        "Aithal Srikanth" <sraithal@....com>,
        Sapkal Swapnil <Swapnil.Sapkal@....com>,
        "K Prateek Nayak" <kprateek.nayak@....com>, <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V1 4/6] sched/numa: Increase tasks' access history

hi, Raghu,

On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 11:45:18AM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> On 9/12/2023 7:54 PM, kernel test robot wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > hi, Raghu,
> > 
> > hope this third performance report for same one patch-set won't annoy you,
> > and better, have some value to you.
> 
> Not at all. But thanks a lot and am rather more happy to see this
> exhaustive results.
> 
> Because: It is easy to show see that patchset is increasing readability
> of code or maintainance of code etc.,
> while I try my best to see regressions are within noise level for some
> corner cases and some benchmarks have improved noticeably, there is
> always a room to miss something.
> Reports like this, helps to boost confidence on patchset.
> 
> Also your cumulative (bisection) report also helped to evaluate
> importance of each patch too..

ok, will keep sending report if any :)

> > 
> > 
> I hope I can add your tested-by if I need to REBASE the patch for -mm
> tree depending on the feedback I get any further with any minor changes.

sure!

Tested-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>

> 
> 
>