[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZQF5Y2crg3TuyHOn@shikoro>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 10:57:07 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>,
Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@...dia.com>,
Michael Shych <michaelsh@...dia.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] i2c: I2C_MLXCPLD on ARM64 should depend on ACPI
On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 02:00:36PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> The "i2c_mlxcpld" platform device is only instantiated on X86 systems
> (through drivers/platform/x86/mlx-platform.c), or on ARM64 systems with
> ACPI (through drivers/platform/mellanox/nvsw-sn2201.c). Hence further
> restrict the dependency on ARM64 to ACPI, to prevent asking the user
> about this driver when configuring an ARM64 kernel without ACPI support.
>
> While at it, document in the Kconfig help text that the driver supports
> ARM64/ACPI based systems, too.
>
> Fixes: d7cf993f832ad2a4 ("i2c: mlxcpld: Allow driver to run on ARM64 architecture")
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Removed Fixes tag and applied to for-current, thanks!
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists