linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i2c: designware: Fix corrupted memory seen in the ISR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 13 Sep 2023 11:04:00 +0200
From:   Yann Sionneau <ysionneau@...rayinc.com>
To:     Jan Bottorff <janb@...amperecomputing.com>,
        Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jan Dabros <jsd@...ihalf.com>,
        Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: designware: Fix corrupted memory seen in the ISR

Hi Jan,

On 13/09/2023 03:03, Jan Bottorff wrote:
> Errors were happening in the ISR that looked like corrupted
> memory. This was because writes from the core enabling interrupts
> where not yet visible to the core running the ISR. A write barrier
Typo where => were
> assures writes to driver data structures are visible to all cores
> before interrupts are enabled.
Maybe rephrase this using the direct style describing what the commit 
does like "Add a write barrier before enabling interrupts to assure [...]"
>
> The ARM Barrier Litmus Tests and Cookbook has an example under
> Sending Interrupts and Barriers that matches the usage in this
> driver. That document says a DSB barrier is required.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Bottorff <janb@...amperecomputing.com>
> ---
>   drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-master.c | 8 ++++++++
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-master.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-master.c
> index ca1035e010c7..1694ac6bb592 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-master.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-master.c
> @@ -248,6 +248,14 @@ static void i2c_dw_xfer_init(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
>   	/* Dummy read to avoid the register getting stuck on Bay Trail */
>   	regmap_read(dev->map, DW_IC_ENABLE_STATUS, &dummy);
>   
> +	/*
> +	 * To guarantee data written by the current core is visible to
> +	 * all cores, a write barrier is required. This needs to be
> +	 * before an interrupt causes execution on another core.
> +	 * For ARM processors, this needs to be a DSB barrier.
> +	 */
> +	wmb();
> +
>   	/* Clear and enable interrupts */
>   	regmap_read(dev->map, DW_IC_CLR_INTR, &dummy);
>   	regmap_write(dev->map, DW_IC_INTR_MASK, DW_IC_INTR_MASTER_MASK);

Apart from the commit message it looks good to me.

If I understand correctly without this wmb() it is possible that the 
writes to dev->msg_write_idx , dev->msg_read_idx = 0 etc would not yet 
be visible to another CPU running the ISR handler right after enabling 
those.

Reviewed-by: Yann Sionneau <ysionneau@...rayinc.com>

Tested-by: Yann Sionneau <ysionneau@...rayinc.com>

Thanks!

Regards,

-- 

Yann