[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <CVHOZMZHDPIE.225HW6UH95GX9@suppilovahvero>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 12:46:16 +0300
From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: "Haitao Huang" <haitao.huang@...ux.intel.com>,
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <tj@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org>,
<x86@...nel.org>, <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<mingo@...hat.com>, <bp@...en8.de>, <hpa@...or.com>,
<sohil.mehta@...el.com>
Cc: <zhiquan1.li@...el.com>, <kristen@...ux.intel.com>,
<seanjc@...gle.com>, <zhanb@...rosoft.com>,
<anakrish@...rosoft.com>, <mikko.ylinen@...ux.intel.com>,
<yangjie@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/18] x86/sgx: Add sgx_epc_lru_lists to encapsulate
LRU lists
On Wed Sep 13, 2023 at 7:06 AM EEST, Haitao Huang wrote:
> From: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Introduce a data structure to wrap the existing reclaimable list and its
> spinlock. Each cgroup later will have one instance of this structure to
> track EPC pages allocated for processes associated with the same cgroup.
> Just like the global SGX reclaimer (ksgxd), an EPC cgroup reclaims pages
> from the reclaimable list in this structure when its usage reaches near
> its limit.
>
> Currently, ksgxd does not track the VA, SECS pages. They are considered
> as 'unreclaimable' pages that are only deallocated when their respective
> owning enclaves are destroyed and all associated resources released.
>
> When an EPC cgroup can not reclaim any more reclaimable EPC pages to
> reduce its usage below its limit, the cgroup must also reclaim those
> unreclaimables by killing their owning enclaves. The VA and SECS pages
> later are also tracked in an 'unreclaimable' list added to this structure
> to support this OOM killing of enclaves.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> ---
> V4:
> - Removed unneeded comments for the spinlock and the non-reclaimables.
> (Kai, Jarkko)
> - Revised the commit to add introduction comments for unreclaimables and
> multiple LRU lists.(Kai)
> - Reordered the patches: delay all changes for unreclaimables to
> later, and this one becomes the first change in the SGX subsystem.
>
> V3:
> - Removed the helper functions and revised commit messages.
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/sgx.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/sgx.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/sgx.h
> index d2dad21259a8..018414b2abe8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/sgx.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/sgx.h
> @@ -83,6 +83,20 @@ static inline void *sgx_get_epc_virt_addr(struct sgx_epc_page *page)
> return section->virt_addr + index * PAGE_SIZE;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Tracks EPC pages reclaimable by the reclaimer (ksgxd).
> + */
> +struct sgx_epc_lru_lists {
> + spinlock_t lock;
> + struct list_head reclaimable;
> +};
> +
> +static inline void sgx_lru_init(struct sgx_epc_lru_lists *lrus)
> +{
> + spin_lock_init(&lrus->lock);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&lrus->reclaimable);
> +}
> +
> struct sgx_epc_page *__sgx_alloc_epc_page(void);
> void sgx_free_epc_page(struct sgx_epc_page *page);
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Looks good but not yet time for ack'ing.
BR, Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists